1. Lord Rama was a God or not is surely a matter of faith. But Attaching Lord Rama to a material needs to be proved factially. Let this be Rama's birth place (specifying exact location) or Ramasethu bridge.
2. Matter of faith is linked to one's belief, but a matter of material fact is to be proved.
RE:Faith Vs Fact
by Kaka Rads on Sep 12, 2007 03:42 PM Permalink
Islam is a religion of nomads & monkeys. No point in arguing with moslem with no rational outlook. It is like fighting with a pig. Because is the pig that enjoys the fight.
RE:RE:Faith Vs Fact
by Ruby Naushad on Sep 12, 2007 03:42 PM Permalink
Let there be a separate session on Kaba. Why do you escape from the original issue?
RE:Faith Vs Fact
by Ruby Naushad on Sep 12, 2007 03:37 PM Permalink
The issue relat3es to ramasethu. Why to drag Hinduism/other religions beliefs in this. This shows lack of our sanity.
RE:RE:Faith Vs Fact
by Ruby Naushad on Sep 12, 2007 03:40 PM Permalink
Your above content is running one sentence. It is a matter of fact, which can eb examined. You are writing in a fist of anger?, could be a matter of faith/my imagination dear.
RE:RE:Faith Vs Fact
by Ruby Naushad on Sep 12, 2007 03:38 PM Permalink
Babari Masjid was constructed when every happening was being recorded, Lord Rama was claimed to be born when even printing paper was not discovered.
