(1) Ram & Laxman guarded as Watch & Ward the lake of Madhuranthagam and appeared before the English Collector - just about 180 years ago; (2) Ram & Laxman appeared before Kutub Shahi king Tanishah, Nizam Nawab of Golconda in the year 1630 AD (17th century) and later the Ruler of Golconda became a staunt devotee of Ram; (3) Ram & Laxman appeared before Saint Thygaraja just about 180 years ago. There may be others too. What further evidence is required by the Centre other than from a Britisher and a Muslim? The Centre is fooling themselves and in this game, the Congress and its allies will lose the Hindu vote bank. Why did they name the dredging ship as "Hanuman" ?
RE:Ram's existence.
by Krishna Arjun on Sep 13, 2007 12:48 AM Permalink
sachar report recommondations are getting implemented soon ..by which our muslim brothers will get direct reservations in army, police , govt offices ...at all places.
this action of congress and left will give congress 100 % muslim votes ...who cares for hindu votes ...no use ..no any importance to hindus.
RE:Ram's existence.
by manav gupta on Sep 13, 2007 12:46 AM Permalink
hello friend the BJP said ram existed only their congress said ram existed everywhere and so we should not stop development because of a specific place so as per this defination I think BJP will lose their Hindu vote bank
