How dare you say "no 'historical record' to incontrovertibly prove the existence of the character, or the occurrences of the events, depicted" in the Ramayana.
Do you have any Historical Records to prove that your forefathers begat you?
The Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Upanishad and the Vedas were not written down but handed down, by word-of-mouth, from father to son; and if you Thootias are not aware of this I hope that the learned judges of the Supreme Court of the India are not as idiotic as you.
By the way what does Sonia Gandhi have to say about the Bible which (originally orally communicated, too) does not have, nor gives, a firm proof ("show me the birth certifcate") or a date-lined chronicled written record about the birth of Christ.
There are no correct "historical records" of many things that happened even a few years back. So why put Hindus at a disadvantage in what is essentially their own land ?!?!?!
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by malcom a on Sep 12, 2007 05:05 PM Permalink
Communication experts of NASA say that false, suspect news finds much greater circulation than normal because of the internet. NASA's Hess said, "The images reproduced on the websites may well be ours, but their interpretation is certainly not ours."
RE:RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by Cutlet Gravy on Sep 12, 2007 05:21 PM Permalink
We are aware of this.
NASA's Hess can not give incontrovertal proof.
You see he was not present at the time when Ram Sethu was built by Lord Rama.
That does not mean Ram Sethu was not built.
Now there is proof that "certain people" like DMK as well as other convicts and converts are out to hit Hindu sentiments, under water and even below the belt in what was, and still is, essentially HINDU land.
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by bahmophet on Sep 12, 2007 05:08 PM Permalink
dont u worry sanatana dharma will win again. the lord says in the GITA, SAMBAVAMI YUGE YUGE.....
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by just reacting on Sep 12, 2007 05:06 PM Permalink
Spotted on a matchbox - If you heard 2 eyewitness accounts of an accident, you will wonder about history!
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by ravi shanker alugulapati on Sep 12, 2007 05:12 PM Permalink
Even Hindus may say that Jesus was crucified on Rape Charges, Hooliganism etc which you mistook as God and same thing may apply to Mohamed but does it mean it is true???
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by SAAHIL on Sep 12, 2007 05:07 PM Permalink
THEN WHY DID RAM WENT TO SRILANKA.. FOR SITA RITE SO WHT DID HE WAS DOING TO HER.. AND IF HE DIDNT DO ANYTHING THEN .... WHOSE LUV AND KUSH
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by ware vm on Sep 12, 2007 05:09 PM Permalink
Yes you are veyry true, he was not god, he was born as a man, just to teach the poeple that even a simple man can fight to the biggest evil and for that you should not have to be god or flashy tools to show people that you are god. and if you really think he is just a man, try and dare to live life like him.
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by sanjay choudhry on Sep 12, 2007 05:08 PM Permalink
What is so holy about Jesus? He has been proved to be a gay and bible says he used to kiss his male disciples on their lips.
Do you have any proof that a corpse can fly and reach heaven? Show me one proof that virgins can give birth.
You converts sit in our country, practise imported religions ,about the ancient culture of your own land and race and then "jis thaali mein khate ho, use mein ched karto ho."
