Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Forget Ramar Bridge for now. UPA has questioned very existance of Lord Rama.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 05:07 AM   Permalink | Hide replies



Forget Ramar Bridge for now. UPA has questioned very existance of Lord Rama.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Forget Ramar Bridge for now. UPA has questioned very existance of Lord Rama.
by Hari Puttar on Sep 13, 2007 05:10 AM   Permalink
UPA has given a great issue to BJP to cash on. The same way they meddled with Ram temple and let BJP cash on it. Foolish dumb UPA has given canon fodder to BJP.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Forget Ramar Bridge for now. UPA has questioned very existance of Lord Rama.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 05:16 AM   Permalink


UPA don't know the damage it has done today to itself.



It has challenged very existance of Rama, very ideal of Humanity which is driving India for millenium.



I hate to think this is a Poll Issue. But yes, I think the final bell of UPA is now loudly ringing.





   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Forget Ramar Bridge for now. UPA has questioned very existance of Lord Rama.
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 05:18 AM   Permalink
and I would like to see manmohan and sonia on the run....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Forget Ramar Bridge for now. UPA has questioned very existance of Lord Rama.
by Hari Puttar on Sep 13, 2007 05:22 AM   Permalink
Vinashkaale viprita buddhi - true for CONgress.
Bahut ho gayi jesus ki India main parade.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Forget Ramar Bridge for now. UPA has questioned very existance of Lord Rama.
by Vishnu Veni on Sep 13, 2007 05:52 AM   Permalink
Correction, it is ASI's finding, now any one can disprove because it is infront of court who ultimately decides which is just as per law. Sometimes it is very very difficult to digest these kind of news(facts as per ASI), especially when you and all your household beleive from birth. I recommend whoever has the proof should present infront of the court instead of these discussions in media. Can't in India anyone who can keep a lawyer who can defend or prove against ASI?



But remember just because we beleived, truth will not become false or false become truth. E.g., many centuries people beleieved earth is flat, or sun going around earth... did they change just because we believed. When the proof came beleiefs have to change accordingly otherwise we making ourselves liars and our children followers of the lie. if any questions please mail me at kratnakar@gmail.com

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'