RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by Vish on Sep 12, 2007 10:23 PM Permalink
Some Dumb Asses have made this North-South issue.
Dummies, your Baap, ASI has given their decision on the existance of Rama and Ramayana. Who the hell government to decide on religious beliefs of billions of people? Do they decide religious discussions in other faiths? Their hypocrisy and insensitivity is the core issue.
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by kskumar on Sep 12, 2007 10:20 PM Permalink
I see from your posts that you are a faithful follower of Karunanidhi and his selective aethist ideas and other related rubbish. What will the Government lose if the canal is rerouted? Saying that there is no evidence for Ram and Ramayana is not the issue. One can give innumerable examples from other religious scriptures to question the very faith of those religions. The point here is whether the Government will respect the sentiments expressed and agree to reroute the canal. This it is unwilling to do for fear of antagonizing MK, the Senile Old Man of the South, who is bent upon humiliating Hindu beliefs as much as possible. And with people like you to support him, he may well succeed.
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by Arun karthick on Sep 12, 2007 10:24 PM Permalink
The main reason for this project is. 1.to reduce the travel time of ships and not focus on revenues to india. 2.If it is rerouted the main objective of this project will be affected.
no one will use it and it will be a big failure.
As i am tamil,i know the value of this project.
i have went many times to rameshwaram and seen this bridge ,than u guys.
RE:RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by FUN MAN on Sep 12, 2007 10:26 PM Permalink
but TN is India's property so Indian's has right to comment and express their views. Dont get irritated as if it is your personal hard earning.
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by kskumar on Sep 12, 2007 10:30 PM Permalink
By your reasoning the Qutb Minar is the property of Delhi, Taj Mahal that of the UP etc. You think only of the Revenue. What about the fishermen whose livelihood is at stake? And the bridge acted like a breakwater during the tsunami of 2004. Fianally, I am a Tamil too, so don't give me that rubbish.
Please check the facts on rerouting before concluding that the main objective of the project will be affected. There are 6 alignments which can be used for the project and 2 of them will have no impact on Ram sethu and may be cost effective as it reduces the distance as well.
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by manoj on Sep 12, 2007 10:24 PM Permalink
Karunanidhi is supported by more than hindu tamilians so son't under estimate the intelligence of this literate people.
So if you northie wants us to believe some cooked up story then you have to give convincing evidence no stupid street protests
RE:does srilanka allow ram sethu?
by FUN MAN on Sep 12, 2007 10:25 PM Permalink
Mr Arun all these people want to see the bridge that is the reason why they asking to leave the bridge alone. Hope you understand now.