Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Answer to B K
by firefly on Sep 13, 2007 05:01 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

B K if ur educated....tell me what Shoals mean?

FYI Shoals are rocks cut. The Bridge to Lanka consists of shoals that float on water..they are huge rocks floating on water.



I dont know your religion..but read RAMAYANA...two neanderthal moneky men named Neel and Angad who were expert thinkers decided to cut rocks in a particular volume so that they float on water. These huge rocks sustained the forces of waves and also helped the army cross the bridge easily.



Lanka in the epic and Lanka existing now couldnt be a coincidence right? at least be rational. NASA themselves had agreed that civilisation existed in SriLanka around 10000BC right?



Dont beleive in NASA too much. American government, Cocacola, Google are involved in a big scam of altering content on Wikipedia too.

A hacker in the recent news had prooved it by his software.



Hindus are not fundamentalists. We have ancient scriptures and evidences. Even Mathura exists under water. Its prooved.



While there is no evidence for ADAM to travel to INDIA....how did u accept it then as ADAMS BRIDGE? SO u are the Superstitious fools not HINDUS.



Did any Hindu question Christian or Muslim scriptures? Dont touch the tigers tail.



The english are far most the most unintelligent people who have declared most of their inventions from stolen facts which were already discovered ages back. We have evidence and can prove it to u online.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Answer to B K
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 05:04 AM   Permalink


Scientific proof that Ram Setu was because of Human Activity



http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070508/asp/nation/story_7747873.asp

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Answer to B K
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 05:06 AM   Permalink


Forget Ramar Bridge for now. UPA has questioned very existance of Lord Rama.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Answer to B K
by Milind on Sep 13, 2007 05:07 AM   Permalink
Firefly...No I dont think shoals are rock cut. They are in fact snadbanks usually made out of sand,silt & small pebbles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoal

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Answer to B K
by Vishnu Veni on Sep 13, 2007 05:55 AM   Permalink
Why don;t you prove this in court?



Correction, it is ASI's finding, now any one can disprove because it is infront of court who ultimately decides which is just as per law. Sometimes it is very very difficult to digest these kind of news(facts as per ASI), especially when you and all your household beleive from birth. I recommend whoever has the proof should present infront of the court instead of these discussions in media. Can't in India anyone who can keep a lawyer who can defend or prove against ASI?



But remember just because we beleived, truth will not become false or false become truth. E.g., many centuries people beleieved earth is flat, or sun going around earth... did they change just because we believed. When the proof came beleiefs have to change accordingly otherwise we making ourselves liars and our children followers of the lie. if any questions please mail me at kratnakar@gmail.com

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'