Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
hindus r coward and meek
by bhawna verma on Sep 12, 2007 07:55 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

its written in history paper, if u will go thru u willl find it, i waas surprised but i think its true. meek and coward, bear this. not new. neta knows thats y its happening. can they do it for any other religion, govt will fall. let be pop reach more than 25%. it will be islamic republic of india. enjoy

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:hindus r coward and meek
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:56 PM   Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.



You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.



But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.



See the difference.

Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:hindus r coward and meek
by abcd on Sep 12, 2007 07:58 PM   Permalink
I couldn't help noticing this as you seem to have posted this more than once. Are you then suggesting Mecca and Medina are not of religious consequence? Do you also mean for the Country's development any Mosqur or Darga can be done away with. if so please confirm, going by your first name the Congress idiots can claim they have finally found one tolerant Muslim.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:hindus r coward and meek
by bhawna verma on Sep 12, 2007 08:03 PM   Permalink
u voted for them. its ur creature. dont make hue and cry. they know thats y they damn care ur sentiment. u can change it, but u wont. any writer who writes truth have been thrown out, because we r secular we cant write. read tavleen singh article. she was thrown from india today. but did u say naything

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:hindus r coward and meek
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 08:06 PM   Permalink
They are a property of the Masjid Trust. The government or anyone has NO claim on them. If a Muslim were to claim a property of someone else based on his/her religious belief...then yes, that is WRONG.



Government cannot take away property belonging to an individual without his/her permission.



There is something called "Property Rights"

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:hindus r coward and meek
by abcd on Sep 12, 2007 08:27 PM   Permalink
Dude wake up to realities, this Govt is apuppet in MNCs hand all your SEZs are done through land acquistions from Individuals. 'Property Rights' is NOT a fundamental right and as such the Govt is able to override it. Go through one experinec of land acquition with this Govt and you will know how firm your 'property Rights' are. the question here is of Sensitivities between human beings. No one can conclusively prove that Muhamed was indeed the messenger of God. Yu beleive it becos your Dad does and probably his forefathers did. So lets not just bring in legal point for argument's sake.





   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:hindus r coward and meek
by gagan chadha on Sep 12, 2007 07:57 PM   Permalink
I agree with you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'