ASI didn't say that Ram doesn't exist.It said Referring to the Ramayana, the affidavit said there is no "historical record" to incontrovertibly prove Ramayana.Why BJP is harping on this line.Talk about other things in the affidavit.
Go through the links ----------- http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IEH20070911002637&Page=H&Headline=Centre files affidavit on Ramar Sethu%0D%3Cbr%3E&Title=Top Stories&Topic=0
RE:..
by Baalu Radhakrishna on Sep 12, 2007 06:03 PM Permalink
Dear Mr Raghu Ram how any one can find evidence unless you try for it? Did ASI made any efforts to find out whether the bridge was man made or natural? ASI should have undertaken such a task and for this it would take atleast two years! but all of a sudden it claims no historical evidence and it also confirms the fact that the bridge is natural-ASI can not say it is Natural but only GSI can confirm the fact!
is it not true! is it not evidenced that the GOVT has pressurised the ASI to submit this reply to hurry up the case or resume the construction!
