Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Ram sethu
by SRINIVASAN BHARGAVAN on Sep 13, 2007 05:27 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

How can a secular govenment can make a statement like that? scularism does not mean anti Hindu or hurting Hindu sentiments..Maryadha Purushotham Ram'existance as one of ten Dasavathars is as sanctimonious to Hindus as the existance of Jesus Christ/Prophet the Mohammed/Guru Nanak Saheb for their respective followers

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Ram sethu
by Reuben on Sep 13, 2007 05:59 AM   Permalink
Yeah but india is not passing on a oppurtunity to save crores of tax payers money for Jesus or Allah. For Ram and that too for a imaginary mythological bridge our economy should be compromised? Cmon you are educated you should know the difference

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Ram sethu
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 06:13 AM   Permalink
they are.by Haj subsidies they are wasting millions of rupees.Stop that and you also try.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'