It is now very clear from the recent contorversy about "Ram Setu" that there is a clear cut bias of Politicans,Govt.agencies and other minorities aginst any thing associated with Hindu Culture/Religion/feelings. No body asks what is the proof of Making a "Makka" a pilgimage site?,or what is the authencity/historicity of connecting religios feelings of Christians to jerusulum or to say Christ himself . On the contrary in Adam's bridge we find a living proof of the authencity of story told in Ramayna.Even if the adam's bridge is not Man Made,it prooves the super natural power of Lord Rama,who is said to be an Avtara.It also proves that any religion/or culture which is most scietific is Hindu.Persons Like Einsteen,Mark Twain and B.Russel have accepted this fact. So people with vested interestor prijudice should leave bias to Hinduism which has answers to several problems of contmporay world-like fanatism,Terrorism,greed and divisiv communal and racial attitudes.Hindu religion is the only religion which is not against any religion, with its prime concept of "Vasudhev kutumb kum"- i.e.'Earth is one planet'.It is the only religion which is not bind to any single book.Its a philosophy and way of peacful living with love to all -animate and in animate.It is the only scientifc religion or to say scientifc philosophy or a perfect Humanitarian Culture for the Future Man. Arun Raghuwanshi President Yoga Way International,Canada
RE:Ram Setu Controversy:Apolitical and communal bias against hindu things
by udayam enterprises on Sep 12, 2007 10:04 PM Permalink
Your are right, read this by carl sagan
You see, the religious people -- most of them -- really think this planet is an experiment. That's what their beliefs come down to. Some god or other is always fixing and poking, messing around with tradesmen's wives, giving tablets on mountains, commanding you to mutilate your children, telling people what words they can say and what words they can't say, making people feel guilty about enjoying themselves, and like that. Why can't the gods leave well enough alone? All this intervention speaks of incompetence. If God didn't want Lot's wife to look back, why didn't he make her obedient, so she'd do what her husband told her? Or if he hadn't made Lot such a shithead, maybe she would've listened to him more. If God is omnipotent and omniscient, why didn't he start the universe out in the first place so it would come out the way he wants? Why's he constantly repairing and complaining? No, there's one thing the all religious books(koran, bible and gita) makes clear: The religious God is a sloppy manufacturer. He's not good at design, he's not good at execution. He'd be out of business if there was any competition. [Sol Hadden in Carl Sagan's Contact (New York: Pocket Books, 1985), p. 285.]
