My Dear Readers HINDUTYA is something differnt from this Project, please don't link both the prospects together, although it is hurting that the CENTRAL govt. as asking fr the evidence of LORD RAM but that matter can be debated separately as this Project is IMPORTANT fr BOTH the NATIONS, FYI just few days before CHINA build a BRIDGE between HONGKONG and XIAMEN ( CHINA ) just to save navigation time and strengthen the mutual cooperation, so think from ur brain and please don't be sentimental, keep religion aside don't inter link with GROWTH prospects.....
RE:RAM %uFF33%uFF25%uFF34%uFF28%uFF35
by Netflix on Sep 12, 2007 06:14 PM Permalink
Dear friend, Indian ocean is not such a small place that progress of requires destruction of Ram Setu. If you prefer to call it it Adam Bridge call it that. If you think it is a natural construction let it be. However, if it is natural construction, then we need to preserve it even more. This whole thing is just to humilate religious Hindus. In this country, any thing you do against Hindu sentiment is progressive. Long live Sonia and Karat and company
RE:RE:RAM %uFF33%uFF25%uFF34%uFF28%uFF35
by avinash kadam on Sep 12, 2007 06:22 PM Permalink
Yes I agree to it Day by day, unfortuanately we have to belive what rightist group of hindus are saying Because under the name of secularism and rationality, we are dosed to accept wht these so called intellactual jokers like sibal, roy, patkar, sardesai, sonia and karat were sayig.
RE:RAM %uFF33%uFF25%uFF34%uFF28%uFF35
by avinash kadam on Sep 12, 2007 06:19 PM Permalink
it is not only the question of Project and its economic benefits Its the attitude of elected govt towards its own people under the banner of pseuso-secularism. The way Govt has responded to court, its shame for their irresponsible behaviour. Why cant ASI have their own stand irrespective of Gvt stand and vis-a-vis