Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
  RE:RE:No Prove of Allah either
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 10:05 PM   Permalink
Give me ONE example where Muslims are claiming land/property based on Islamic Beliefs ???

Name One...

Existence of ALLAH is a belief. Birth of Prophet Jesus by his Mother Mary, who was a Virgin, is also a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIMS or Christians should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.

You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.

But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.

See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!

Some people gave me the following issues.

Babri Majid - title deed of the land is in the name of a Muslim trust (Wakf Board)

Qutub Minar - Is a historic site, property of the Nation

Taj Mahal - Is a historic site, property of the Nation

Kashmir - It is a political issue. Just as the NorthEast.

Palestine - The JEWS claim Palestien based on the Torah...The Arabs/Jews/Christians were the INHABITANTS of that land. Whya re JEWS migrating from Europe/Russia/US to Israel ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:No Prove of Allah either
by Jai Tiwaree on Sep 12, 2007 10:48 PM   Permalink
The remit of history to include the historian's pre-narrative assumptions and how we translate those assumptions figuratively as we construct our strategies of narrative explanation. Postmodern historians thus ask many fresh questions. Are facts best thought of as events under a description? Is all data ultimately textual and, if so, what are its implications? Should history be written primarily according to literary rules and, if so, what are they? What is the significant difference between literary and figurative speech in history and how does it create historical meaning? How do we distinguish the historical referent of a discourse and its constructed, i.e., its ideological, meaning? Can history ever exist beyond discourse? And the very big question, is history what happened, or what historians tell us happened? All these have to be addressed when we do history, to ignore them is to do only half the job.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:No Prove of Allah either
by Layman on Sep 12, 2007 10:07 PM   Permalink
Ok then. Why all the muslims are fighting for a s**t mosque

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:No Prove of Allah either
by Mama Biskhot on Sep 12, 2007 10:14 PM   Permalink
If the Mosque is given, then other places will be targetted. Anyways u can find Thousands of Temples on roads and footpaths that are illegal. People should stop using these Roads for Traffic and Start these roads for Worship.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:No Prove of Allah either
by Veeramani Sanakaralingam on Sep 12, 2007 10:14 PM   Permalink
don't play useless religious game on a scheme which will help south india to grow. There is no evidence of ram's existence.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'