Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Fact Vs Faith
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:44 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.

You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.

But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.

See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:RE:Fact Vs Faith
by venkatesh s k on Sep 12, 2007 07:49 PM   Permalink
Then can anyone build Temple or Church in Mecca...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Fact Vs Faith
by Thalaivar on Sep 12, 2007 07:48 PM   Permalink
Ok...let us build a market or big latrine in the place of Mecca masjid so that it will be useful for all.
Anyhow muslims like Imran Patel is not having any objection

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Fact Vs Faith
by ravish sinha on Sep 12, 2007 07:48 PM   Permalink
Break all kabba & make hospital at that place. Whether u agree for this. I am hindu. But I will also not agree for breaking kaba or any mosque. Same is the case for Rama Setu.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Fact Vs Faith
by venkat on Sep 12, 2007 07:45 PM   Permalink
So you are not claiming that the Kaaba is property of the muslims?!!

What crap bullshit you are.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Fact Vs Faith
by Hemant on Sep 12, 2007 07:51 PM   Permalink
Through the same belief, Lord Rama also exists.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'