Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Conspiracy against Hinduism
by Surajit Dash on Sep 13, 2007 01:39 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

This is pure consiracy against Hindus. Who is looking for proof ? There is no proof - who built the Taj Mahal, Qutab Minar etc .. So they should also be destroyed.

I dont know when will the people of India awake.. after their houses have caught fire ?

Useless govt.. desnt have any other developmental plans.. Its the conspiracy of non-believers like Karunanidhi and sonia who are atheists.

Hindus awake before your bed catches fire...and you are wiped out of History.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Conspiracy against Hinduism
by Tiger Memon on Sep 13, 2007 01:41 AM   Permalink
haha and by fellow hindus itself like Sonia and Rajiv Gandhi ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Conspiracy against Hinduism
by Ek Hindustani on Sep 13, 2007 01:56 AM   Permalink
You are such an idiot to drag the Taj Mahal and Qutab Minar - which are historically well documented monuments and everyone knows who constructed them. Just shows your bias.
Regarding this recommendation by Centre - as an Indian Muslim - I agree that this has huge implications and constitutes to blasphemy because it directly hurts the sentiments of millions of our countrymen who follow hinduism. I would suggest the Center refrain from making such statements and that they get second opinions in the least by international archeological agencies.
Jai Hind.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Conspiracy against Hinduism
by ritesh kumar on Sep 13, 2007 02:09 AM   Permalink
Hey Ek Hindustani I like ur thinking. But just for your information u can go and check this link. If you feel something is well documented then it does not prove that the point is true. If something can be challenged using facts then it might be false. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taj_Mahal:_The_True_Story_(book)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'