Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Answer abdullah
by Rajarshi Dutta on Sep 12, 2007 07:29 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

After reading all these I felt abdullah is a nice guy though communist may be. Somebody said once either you are a communist or a patriot meaning a communist can't be a patriot in a multi-colour,multi-languages and muti-religion society.Anyways....My gut feeing is that though abdullah is muslim but he is truly indian and whatever he said so far its not shit...very reasonable.I would just like to ask abdullah don't you think india should have an Uniform civil code. Can a country be said great if it posses different rules among it citizens? and last why doesn't educated people like him doesn't speak about muslim fundamentalist,immams,burkhas, fatwa etc. etc


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Answer abdullah
by afzal ahmed on Sep 12, 2007 07:46 PM   Permalink
Uniform civil code will also do away with rules pertaining to Hindus. There aren't many special rule for any one community. Its just that Islam restricts number of wives to four which is getting others jealous. But no other religion has put any restrictions on the number of wives a person can have, including Hinduism and Christianity. Monogamy is a modern rule started by the Whites and introduced in India by the British. Think about it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Answer abdullah
by Rajarshi Dutta on Sep 12, 2007 07:49 PM   Permalink
I don't waste my time thinking about people who doesn't love our beloved nation and are traitors.Thanks

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Answer abdullah
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 07:34 PM   Permalink
Rajarshi,
The point here is that ASI claims that RAM never existed. You may think otherwise and I respect your belief.

But based on your belief, you CANNOT claim a land/property/right. That is where the problem is. And the same applies to Muslims/Christians/Jews.

Jews CANNOT claim ISRAEL as their just because it says in the Torah...That is NOT a legal argument.

Government has to enforce the LAW, not take sides.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Answer abdullah
by Rajarshi Dutta on Sep 12, 2007 07:46 PM   Permalink
Hi Imran, i do agree with u and i too do feel there was not any existance of ram and so....But I also feel the bigger problem for the 21st century is not neuclear bom but its a terrorist form of muslim religion which is bothering me and until and unless u educated muslim people doesn't come out in the street and open your mouth against theses terrorist form of islam thinks can't improve. If we hindus do that we will be tabbed as communial. Peach muslims to follow sufism rather than this terrosit form of islam.I am telling this to you cz u seemded to be an educated and truly inidian muslim.we all like our lives and so unitedly we have to speak against this keeping aside vote bank politics

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Answer abdullah
by Alexander on Sep 12, 2007 07:36 PM   Permalink
absoulutely!

completely agree.

most people on the forum seem to be crackers... i mean seems like there're only a few sane ppl online

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'