Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RAM WAS WHO?
by JOHN BHATIA on Sep 12, 2007 10:38 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Wednesday's affidavit filed jointly by Central government, ASI, and other government agencies virtually puts a question mark against authenticity of the epic called Ramayana and even questions whether the incidents mentioned in it including the battle between Lord Ram and Ravana ever took place.
If Ram and Ramayan has no valid historical fact, why BJP and their Hindu militants are fighting for centuries for "Ram Mandir" movement in Ayodhya, which has killed mnay thousands innocent Muslims around INDIA and destroyed their lives?

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
  RE:RAM WAS WHO?
by Vish on Sep 12, 2007 10:42 PM   Permalink
John Bhatia?

What kind clown name is this? How come people name themselves like clowns?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RAM WAS WHO?
by talk cool on Sep 12, 2007 10:41 PM   Permalink
u moron.....this ASI is invincible?? Do u think what ever they tell is correct?
They make their thories based on some 'assumptions' only.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RAM WAS WHO?
by biz Narayan on Sep 12, 2007 10:40 PM   Permalink
That is because Christian fanatics are there to impose their 6000 year fundamentalist world view, we hope Ram will defend the civillization from christian fundamentalists.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RAM WAS WHO?
by wani bhardwaj on Sep 12, 2007 10:41 PM   Permalink
Converted people never respects their own mother and country. What else we can say.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'