Okay, now will the Sonia led govt answer what is the Proof for the existence of Jesus or Mohammed? There existence is as or more controversial than Ram's existence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_jesus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Muhammad
So why not ban christmas, easter, churches and tear down mosques? What's wrong with demolition of Babri? Why waste tax payers money for Hajj subsidies for Muslims to go worship half way across the globe for something which does not exist? Why only single out Hindus? This shows the real character of Sonia led government. The ruling government has openly insulted the beliefs of the majority in their own country. Imagine someone wanting to tear down the Kabah in Saudi Arabia because there is no proof for Mohammed (as shown above)
RE:Proof for Ramayana
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 08:28 PM Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. Birth of Prophet Jesus by his Mother Mary, who was a Virgin, is also a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIMS or Christians should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
