With the above statements, I request you to ask ASI to withdraw this statement from SC. The ASI may submit the affidavit that it has not found any agrological evidence to prove that the so-called Bridge is man made. Off course it has to provide completed method it has followed to prove it. But to prove it, the ASI need not has to say that There is no proof of existence of Lord RAMA. Because we knows ASI can not find any proof of this as Lord RAMA is GOD.
RE:Kindly Attention Mr. Manmoahn Singh, PM, GOI
by imran patel on Sep 12, 2007 08:14 PM Permalink
Existence of ALLAH is a belief. But based on that belief a MUSLIM should NOT and CANNOT claim rights on a property. He/she should own that property LEGALLY.
You may dis-agree with the existence of ALLAH. That is ur faith.
But Muslims are not claiming any Land/Property/Right based on their belief in ALLAH.
See the difference.
Sonia gandhi is not claiming anyone elses property based on her Belief !!!
