The Apex court has killed two birds in one shot.Solved the Ramjanbhoomi Problem once for all-No proof no temple rights,and pulled the plug of the VHP vote bank politics.
The only irony is the court many time uses the words 'Lakhman Rekha' in it's judgement.What's legal sanctity to this in the legal lexicon after the present SC query on the Sethusamudram project.
RE:Hey Ram -No Proof !
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 12:59 AM Permalink
Very easy for them.But why would an inveder named Babar go build a mosque in a small town like Ayodhya if it is not to suppress the Hindu faith?They can say things like there was no Ram temple,but why mosques in Ayaodhaya and in Varanasi the sacred city of Hindus for more than 5000 years.Can Hindus go and build a tempole in Mecca or Madina even in 21st century?
