Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
CAN DMK PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING?
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:52 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

1. Evidence for the Kannagi Burning Madurai?
2. Evidence for Kumari Kandam?
3. Evidence for Aryan invasion myths?
4. Evidence for popularity of Atheism in TN?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:CAN DMK PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING?
by prabha periyasamy on Sep 13, 2007 12:57 AM   Permalink
Chance illa no chance for that MGR fan... MR old man spking for minorities votes... nothing more old age formula...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:CAN DMK PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING?
by prabha periyasamy on Sep 13, 2007 12:58 AM   Permalink
hindus shld wake up in TN first

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:CAN DMK PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING?
by Reuben on Sep 13, 2007 01:03 AM   Permalink
You call yourself a MGR Fan and still an idiot. We are not trying to question the evidence, but establish an economic basis for the Sethusamudram project. Tax payers money were not wasted to protect Kannagi memorobilia. do you get it?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:CAN DMK PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING?
by Arun karthick on Sep 13, 2007 01:00 AM   Permalink
any prob with kannagi for u.
is any people fighting or arguing with u abt it?

if it is prob for indias development ,throw that kannagi

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:CAN DMK PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING?
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 01:02 AM   Permalink
Yes, that statue was obstruction to traffic, thats why it was removed in prev govt

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:CAN DMK PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING?
by Reuben on Sep 13, 2007 01:05 AM   Permalink
And that you are comparing to crores of ruppees this bridge can bring to indians and tamils? Job oppurtunities and businesses...trade. I am sorry...you are still an idiot

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'No evidence of Ram'