Indian society has been plagued by two major types of violence. One is that related to the sectarian one, the one which began with Jablapur riots of 1961, which intensified greatly during the decades of 1980s, the one which gradually assumed the shape of pogrom like the ones of 1984 (Delhi), 1992-3 (Mumbai) and Gujarat (2002). The two latter one of these also showed that lot of organization and planning is being put in to the same. In the context of the punishments being pronounced in the Mumbai blast cases, the demand resurfaced that even the guilty of 1992-93 carnage should also be punished. Just to recall after these riots this Commission worked painstakingly for five years and came to various conclusions and also named those who were guilty of violation of laws due to which the violence took such horrendous shape.
The violence which looked to be spontaneous was investigated by sitting judge Shrikrishna, who after five years of painstaking investigation concluded many a things relating to violence and blasts. About the spread of violence it put the square blame on the failure of police machinery, the role of provocative writings in Shiv Sena paper Saamana and another paper Navakaal, and the role played by Shiv Sena-BJP as a whole, Shiv Sena had later started Maha Aarti, which was meant to mobilize people and give provocation to them. "The Maha Artis were started from 26th December 1992 and kept adding to the communal tension and endangering the fragile peace which had b
RE:Active Cell
by Rahul Punjabi on Sep 02, 2007 05:06 PM Permalink
Two incidents you forgot to mention. 1. The Fanatism behind partion of India in 1947 and total cleansing of minorities from Muslim areas of Indian subcontinent 2. 1989 started Islamic cleansing of minorities from Kashmir Valley.
These are two major incidents from India but nobody dares to say anything about it. These two incidents are not isolated ones but are part of International Islamic propaganda and political agenda. Shariat law can never treat non-muslims equally. Its in its inception. Otherwise Why do not the muslims say something about the suppression of rights of non-muslims in Islamic countries? According to Sharia is a muslim leaves his faith then its apostacy but Muslims want the right of converting others elsewhere. How can this be said as a religious practice? It pure political agenda.
