As I can see people have different prespective about agreement...not sure how many have read the full-text and have made attempts to understand and analyze it...here it is, - some think, its a total give-away by US, free-supply of uranium and unlimited energy availability in India... - some may have selfish reasons, working for american companies, directly or indirectly, expecting the good-will getting extended to trading relations... - people with inclination towards political parties, personal thinking aligned with political party's - people who are pro-123 seems to be very abusive:-(...and who are against-123 are trying to make sense and sound logical:-) - most are not evaluating/ weighing the options - most not bothered about India losing stratagic edge - if CPM thinks the agreement is against national interest, whats wrong in listening to their point of view???...publicly sharing communist (china,russia) idealogy doesnt make them lesser indians..it is better than sharing world bank/foreign views on how Indian economy should be run, man-mohan, montek... - the deal is good only if ends nuclear isolation - the deal is good only if it provides free-access to world nuclear asset/markt w/o india having to stake its strategic interests - India should start profile the leaders and key-people to know values they share, with conviction and consistency... - Manmohan trying to reciprocate things at his personal capacity...not minding he is PM of a soverign nation...not ha
RE:perspectives...
by Lalatendu Deo on Sep 01, 2007 10:00 PM Permalink
I can not make out as to what is the zest. Can you be a little specific? Tell me whether the Deal is Good or whether it is bad. And why. Let us all think about your observations as well.
RE:perspectives...
by Dinesh Nagaraju on Sep 01, 2007 10:18 PM Permalink
my last few lines summarizes everything... anyways, share some of the objections expressed by commies...also, appreciate things like, ending nuclear isolation that comes with the deal...evaluating/ weighing the deal should be purely based on trade-offs, analyzed by experts...and i think experts can do a better job...sure commies and other indian experts must have taken pains to study and understand, to see India is losing anything...im not as authoritive as them...see things that are wickedly wrong/ obious...doesnt matter what way deal goes as long as India gains!...and only good indians and experts could decide whether India gains/ loses...
RE:perspectives...
by Indian JaiHind on Sep 02, 2007 01:32 AM Permalink
Wow man. You seems a Commie supporters?. Do u really think that the commies took time to understand the deal. Do u have time to understand the deal after spending so much time in organising where and how to make country more poor so that they can get more supporters
RE:perspectives...
by Niharika Sharma on Sep 02, 2007 03:19 AM Permalink
First the whole nation is nt rich, more then 70% people r poor and if commies think abt them, thats nt crime. Communist leaders are one of the most wellread, articulate and clean peole then cong,bjp or any other parties. if they something, then surely they understand what they r syaing. they dont become leaders just coz they r son/daugther of some big leader or they pump money to become leader overnight. they go and work within people.
well its very normal that u will oppose it coz may someone from yr family is working in us or u too want to migrate their. its ver FUNNY THE BIGGEST SUPPORTER OF THE DEAL WILL PROBABLY NEVER LIKE TO LIVE IN INDIA, DREAM ABT EMIGRATING TO USA OR ALREADY A NRI THERE. THEY WANT THE DEAL TO GO AHEAD BADLY W/O DEBATE COZ THEY WANT TO SEE THEIR OWN INTERESTS. HARDLY THEY ARE BOTHERED ABT THE REST OF THE PEOPLE. INDIA IS RULED BY CONG PARTY FOR 50 YRS, COMMIES NEVER RULED IT. ITS POLICIES ARE ALWAYS OPENLY OR SECRETLY CAPITALIST. SO WHY DIDNT INDIA'S ALL PROBLEM EVAPORATE ?
RE:perspectives...
by Anuj Kumar Singh on Sep 02, 2007 09:38 AM Permalink
they only knows how to bark. they are old regid. You communist want the Indian leave as slave then you will feel happy
RE:perspectives...
by Dinesh Nagaraju on Sep 01, 2007 09:34 PM Permalink
As I can see people have different prespective about agreement...not sure how many have read the full-text and have made attempts to understand and analyze it, here it is, - some think, its a total give-away by US, free-supply of uranium and unlimited energy availability in India - some may have selfish reasons, working for american companies, directly or indirectly, expecting the good-will getting extended to trading relations - people with inclination towards political parties, personal thinking aligned with political party's - people who are pro-123 seems to be very abusive:-( and who are against-123 are trying to make sense and sound logical:-) - most are not evaluating/ weighing the options - most not bothered about India losing stratagic edge - if CPM thinks the agreement is against national interest, whats wrong in listening to their point of view???...publicly sharing communist (china,russia) idealogy doesnt make them lesser indians. it is better than sharing world bank/foreign views on how Indian economy should be run, man-mohan, montek. - the deal is good only if ends nuclear isolation - the deal is good only if it provides free-access to world nuclear asset/markt w/o india having to stake its strategic interests - India should start profile the leaders and key-people to know values they share, with conviction and consistency. - Manmohan trying to reciprocate things at his personal capacity not minding he is PM of a soverign nation not having unbiased vie
