No-doubt, Pravin Mahajan did kill his brother, Bharatiya Janata Party leader Pramod Mahajan but the trial court has to take all the circumstances into consideration as what are the reasons that Pravin Mahajan had gone to that extent? Whether he was insane at the moment? Whether the murder is result of any sudden provocation? To what extent the Bharatiya Janata Party leader Pramod Mahajan contributed in his very sad story of murder and that would be remembered as a stigma in Indian society? Whether both the prosecution story as well as defense version are concocted in the case and to what extent these could be relied upon? Whether the witnesses are planted and the circumstances are being manipulated by the prosecution and accused after thought in the case? To see, whether the emotional feelings of accused and contribution of Pramod Mahajan in his own murder are sufficient to kill someone at Will leaving aside the defence of sudden provocation? Though, it may help the accused to mitigate the quantum of punishment to him in this case. All the omissions and commissions committed in the case are material on the part of prosecution and defence for consideration and those could come out only from the contradictions in the statements of witnesses before the trial court to reach a conclusion to that effect. The purpose of cross-examination of the witnesses is to test their veracity and that only compels the trial court to allow counsel for liberal and lengthy cross-examination in th
RE:Pravin Mahajan makes sensational allegations against Pramod
by an on Oct 31, 2007 10:58 AM Permalink
kya be tere ko koi judge bana diya kya, bhashan de raha hai
RE:Pravin Mahajan makes sensational allegations against Pramod
by Chaklam on Oct 31, 2007 11:42 AM Permalink
ha ah ah sahi bolee bhai.. yee to.. kuch zyada hi bol raha hain.. shayad judge bane diya hain yee rediff walo nee
