Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
PM has to go
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Oct 30, 2007 08:12 PM   Permalink | Hide replies


PM has to go.

Italian Sonia deliberately pushed for this deal which is TOO COSTLY (nuclear seperation between military and non-military).

Plus we are putting TOO MANY reactors under IAEA.

Cost of N-power is way high.

Our strategic Nuclear doctrine is under cloud.

Only good part is, we will be out of Nuclear apartheid. But, I believe: we have to compromise TOO MUCH.

Italian Sonia deliberately did this mess, SO MM SINGH CAN BE CHUCKED OUT, AND RAHUL CAN BE CROWNED.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:PM has to go
by Sathish N on Oct 30, 2007 08:17 PM   Permalink
People in US itself are very worried about their future. This would be wrong time to ink the deal. In youtube, search for "Naomi Wolf End of America" and watch the video. Very scary.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:PM has to go
by raj on Oct 30, 2007 08:30 PM   Permalink
Sathish N, She is an a ultra American lefti. She is nothing but a sudo liberal. She has the right to express her opinion.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:PM has to go
by Sathish N on Oct 30, 2007 08:34 PM   Permalink
Raj, She could be left or right. Don't hear to speeches based on their leaning. Get the points and make a judgment for yourself. I know that Americans have the habit of denigrating left ideas totally and many amongst us just ape them.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:PM has to go
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Oct 30, 2007 08:20 PM   Permalink

So till end of USA, you will keep mum?

Forget that scenario for a second. What will happen to India, if and when USA & NATO vacates Afghanistan? Have you thought abt that?

Islamic flag will be unfurled at Red Fort Delhi.

THINK WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO YOU. AMERICANS WILL TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES. alrigh?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:PM has to go
by Sathish N on Oct 30, 2007 08:26 PM   Permalink
From your response, I can say you have not watched the clip. TO CARE OF US, WE NEED TO KEEP AWAY FROM US.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:PM has to go
by raj on Oct 30, 2007 08:34 PM   Permalink
Sathish, WE NEED TO KEEP AWAY FROM COMMUNIST, WE HAVE ENEMY WITH IN . KARAT AND GANG. THEY ARE THE TRAITORS WORKING FOR THE ROUGE STATE CALLED CHINA . USED TO FOR SOVIET. THEY ARE DONE. YOUR COMMUNISM DEAD AROUND THE WORLD. THIS IS A NEW WORLD. WISEUP .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:PM has to go
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Oct 30, 2007 08:32 PM   Permalink

YOU CARE FOR YOU, I CARE FOR MYSELF.

Stop thinking about USA. Think abt India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:PM has to go
by Sathish N on Oct 30, 2007 08:36 PM   Permalink
You must be a dumb guy. You have know who are signing a deal with before signing the deal. I am also saying that we should not sign the deal, and you have a problem with that???!!!

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:PM has to go
by raj on Oct 30, 2007 08:25 PM   Permalink
Tathagata Mukherjee , Your brain is in the wrong place.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:PM has to go
by ashutosh bose on Oct 30, 2007 08:25 PM   Permalink
PM should be supported in his program of ensuring power security for the country. Nuclear power may be expensive, but other sources of power may not just be there. Those who are opposing the deal are not saying a word on this aspect of the matter. US imperialism is a bogey, Left imperialism is positively HARMING INDIA.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:PM has to go
by Anil Khare on Oct 30, 2007 08:48 PM   Permalink
Those opposed to the deal will be better organised two years from now,

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Delay in N-deal could affect its chances