When DMK announced Bandh in TN, Supreme Court has taken quick action against the DMK saying Governments cannot sponsor bandhs or strikes. Why the Hon'ble Court is silent in the case of Bengal where CPM (ruling party) has sponsored a bandh? This is opportunism from the part of the apex court. Rule should be same for all. In India CPM ruled States are the worst States where political killings are at a higher level. The Central Government should act seriously against this. At least Centre should ask for a detailed report from the State Government on this type of brutal activities and initiate action against them. These Goonda Comrades talking of common man's problems always, are killing innocent people. Actully the the present struggle in Nandigram is the result of seeds sowed by CPM during the past only. This type of struggles were always conducted by CPM in Bengal and Kerala. In Kerala even now they are following this type of 18th century struggles with the support of State Government. The Central Government and Supreme Court should take serious action against those who are culprits. If Central Government is having guts to control CPM, even though they withdraw their support. Taking their support is always dangerous to Government.
RE:Why Supreme Court is silent?
by HariKrishna Alur on Oct 29, 2007 12:34 PM Permalink
There is a party(AIADMK) with some spine in TN who could file a writ in the court. But the same has not been done by TC in W.B. Moreover , in TN, it was state bandh. In WB, it is restricted to Nandigram. TC won't file writ because, the party itself is a party to many bandhs. Congress is spineless party. I am wondering why BJP is silent on the issue.
RE:Why Supreme Court is silent?
by S Ramesh on Oct 29, 2007 01:15 PM Permalink
When DMK launched Bundh, the major opposition party of TN ADMK filed a case against the Bandh at SC. So, SC gave that judgement. In WB that level of democracy is not existing. The opposiotion is completely down and the little opposition from Mamata is also mindless.
