Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
  RE:The Ten Commandments on the Schoolroom Wall?
by JGN on Nov 02, 2007 07:28 PM   Permalink
Cont......d

So should our public schools be a place for posting words attributed to a god of an ancient people demanding sole recognition as the god of that people?

The second of the "Ten Commandments, besides its meaning being disputed between the two major branches of Christianity, would, if obeyed, have a devastating effect on our arts and our economy: "Thou shall not make unto thee any graven image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above or that is on the earth, or in the waters under the earth."

This commandment has long been absent from the Roman Catholic version (since the Seventh General Council of year 787), although it may have been lately restored to the catechism. It has been in apparent conflict with the Church's long use of icons and statues. These are only "venerated" according to Church, which now interprets them to be "visual aids" for worship and intervention.

If respected as a basis for secular law, then public support and use of sculpture would have to stop. There would be no more commemorating soldiers of our various wars or of public heroes like Jonas Salk. Are we to bring up our children to feel that such "graven images" are wrong?

The third commandment is not to take the name of "the Lord thy God" in vain. This pertains to the name by which "thy God" had introduced himself in the first commandment, which children are not generally apprized. And what does "take in vain" mean? And why are the names of all other gods not include

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:The Ten Commandments on the Schoolroom Wall?
by JGN on Nov 02, 2007 07:29 PM   Permalink
Cont....d

The fourth commandment (the third by Roman Catholic reckoning) is to "remember the Sabbath to keep it holy." The "Sabbath" was for those who originated this commandment the seventh day of the week, actually beginning on what we call Friday evening and ending about twenty-four hours later. Christianity somehow dropped the seventh day as the Sabbath and instituted the first day of the week and put on it all of the restrictions that previously applied to the seventh day. This again is strictly a religious rule, although certain jurisdictions in the United States have had "blue laws" requiring that no business activities be conducted on Sunday. Modern commercial practices are putting these to rest.

So, to put up the "Ten Commandments" in our public schools as either a set of rules to be followed or as a modedl for laws for our secular society is extremely inappropriate. They would, if required to be followed, establish religious practice and observance, quite at odds with the First Amendment of the Constitution.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Ram Sethu: SC refuses to hear plea