What Amarmani had done was indeed a henious crime. But the question arises why Madhumita was in love with a married & powerful man/politician. Perhaps, she was a very ambitious and greedy girl. Nobody can deny that she must have fully enjoyed money and power of the MLA. Why she did not love a normal man of his age and status ? What else the result could be ? Does'nt it look that both of them are Victim vs. Victim ?
RE:Victim Vs. Victim
by Anil Kumar on Oct 25, 2007 12:05 PM Permalink
I agree to the point it is not the child who is guily but parents should alos be punshed for freely allowing their children to roam any where. this should he a stepping stone for other parents. I hope other should learn lesson from it and at least try to understant where they are wrong or right
RE:Victim Vs. Victim
by on Oct 25, 2007 09:38 PM Permalink
Dear Anil Kumar, should I remind you that madhumita was an adult. She can legally sleep with whoever she likes. Parents cannot force their moralities on an adult daughter. Murder is a crime, sleeping is not. Please do not forget that!!!
RE:RE:Victim Vs. Victim
by shiv pandey on Oct 24, 2007 03:02 PM Permalink
I AGREE. Madhumita ke ghar walo ko bhi sochana chahiya tha ki BITIA kaun si kavita kahati hai jisase itni kamai hoti hai ki woh Ceillo Car maintain kare and luxrious life enjoy kare. They are also responsible.
