Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
part5
by korak manna on Oct 23, 2007 03:23 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Now please don' fight here guys.....

Give suggestion... alll u anti deal gusy of whatwe can do?

n pro guys as to how can we handle ourselves if the fears arised by communist come out true....



    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:part5
by Modern Saint on Oct 23, 2007 03:30 PM   Permalink
The point is rite now, world is unipolar. US dominates the world politics. China and Russia take different stands on various issues but find no buyers.

Various nations included signed CTBT including China which means that all the nations who signed have agreed to US dominance according to communist of India. Infact, China legally is so vulnerable that tomorrow, China is found of nuclear proliferation, US can impose heavy economic sanctions alienating it from the rest of the world.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:part5
by korak manna on Oct 23, 2007 03:35 PM   Permalink
U got a very valid valid point brother..... I didn' rite this point coz my article has already become very big

hehehehehehe

But then buddy U tell me what if Communist fears comes out true in future.... i do' wanna no how helll bad does china gets. i want to know what would we be doing if US pulls out

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:part5
by Modern Saint on Oct 23, 2007 03:48 PM   Permalink
US will put only if we sell or buy crucial nuclear technologies to non-nuclear or 'hostile' nations.
CORRECTION:u mentioned US forces to deal nuclear energy with itself only which is false.
Other reason would be if India conduct a "nuclear bomb" test.
If India ever felt that it should test nuclear bomb as an ultimate test to its sovereignty, it can. US will put out and stop all nuclear supplies.According to 123 agreement, only nuclear supplies will be hit and not an overall economic sanction.

US cannot detect India for the following reasons:
1)US cannot lose a strategic partner.
2)India has a respectable command in developing nations. Any resolution against India will not gain acceptance in UN. Moreover, it will be vetoed by Russia if India goes against the wishes of US.
3) India is a big economy for US companies.

US has an utopian philosophy of Reagan which India should adopt which makes US the currency of the world.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:part5
by korak manna on Oct 23, 2007 03:56 PM   Permalink
Point taken dude.......

I think even u have gone through the whole agreement n there clauses. Thank God atleast someone has really got the real points of the deal.
Swear tell u buddy first got tired of reading the complete deal n now getting tired of mentioning the positives to toher people..

But stilll Guys who r protesting this deal.i haven' heard anything from. please tellme if u have ne points which defers to ne of my points or my friend here named modern saint.

N please do also mentions what are the other options that u see

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:part5
by Modern Saint on Oct 23, 2007 03:51 PM   Permalink
US will put only if we sell or buy crucial nuclear technologies to non-nuclear or 'hostile' nations.
Other reason would be if India conduct a "nuclear bomb" test.
If India ever felt that it should test nuclear bomb as an ultimate test to its sovereignty, it can. US will put out and stop all nuclear supplies.According to 123 agreement, only nuclear supplies will be hit and not an overall economic sanction.

US cannot dictate India for the following reasons:
1)US cannot lose a strategic partner.
2)India has a respectable command in developing nations. Any resolution against India will not gain acceptance in UN. Moreover, it will be vetoed by Russia if India goes against the wishes of US.
3) India is a big economy for US companies.

US has an utopian philosophy of Reagan which India should adopt which makes US dollar the currency of the world.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Analysis: The real deal on the N-deal