Mr. Ismail Sayyed, your claims are contrary to the facts. The general policy of most of the rulers during the 700 years of Muslim occupation of India was to systematically replace the fabric of Hindu society and culture with a Muslim culture. They tried to destroy Indian religions, language and places of knowledge (e.g Nalanda was totally destroyed by Muslims). They destroyed and desecrated places of thousands of temples including Somnath, Mathura, Benaras, Ayodhaya, Kannauj, Thaneswar and in other places. There was wholesale slaughter of the monks and priests and innocent Hindus with the aim to wipe out the intellectual bedrock of the people they overran.
The Muslims could not subjugate India with ease and were never able to rule it entirely. There was a valiant and ceaseless struggle for independence by Hindus to deliver India from Muslim tyranny. The Rajputs, Jats, Marathas and Sikhs led this struggle in North India. In the South this struggle was embodied in the Vijayanagar Empire. This struggle culminated when the Marathas ended the Muslim domination of India.
All those things happened in an era where MIGHT was RIGHT. There is no need for the Muslims in India to justify the same nor be apologetic about it.
The majority of present day Muslims in India are the decendants of those who suffered at the hands of the invading Arabs. If you want to consider the actocities committed by the invaders on your ancestors, it is your choice!
RE:@ Ismail Sayyed
by zinawar on Oct 16, 2007 03:16 PM Permalink
17 year old muslim girl hung ... who still live in the dark ages that poor girl has to suffer again at the hands of allahs priests i,e the mullahs and imans a more barbaric religion you ...
RE:@ Ismail Sayyed
by tunak on Oct 16, 2007 03:15 PM Permalink
What Mr. Ismail Sayyed and Gold... are ardent believer Mulla history of India. They are the just victim of Arbic culture.
