RE:modi better than sonia
by Hari Puttar on Oct 15, 2007 09:05 PM Permalink
My dear, she had nothing to do with it. It was a scientific observation by a scientific body. It was not menat to hurt any sentiments. There was also an apology. Do not try to believe what u want to believe. Believe in logical facts. Don't let over sentimentality affect ur thinking.
RE:RE:modi better than sonia
by arjuna on Oct 15, 2007 09:08 PM Permalink
can you name the so called scientific body name. hari puttar its the same scientific body which is hiding info on tajmahal
RE:RE:RE:modi better than sonia
by Loan Shark on Oct 15, 2007 09:21 PM Permalink
the body is called Archeoligical Survey of India ... you must read the affidavit to understand it ...
There are lots of conspiracy theories on Taj Mahal .... the gullible and uneducated, fall for them.
RE:modi better than sonia
by Loan Shark on Oct 15, 2007 09:20 PM Permalink
You and I think alike .... most people calling Sonia the reason behind the affidavit haven't even read the affidavit. Most of them who read, have poor reading skills to comprehend it.
The affidavit clearly says that there is no archeological proof of existence of Rama. and there is none ... ok, that does not mean that Rama did not exist, it's just that they don't have a proof ... besides, Lord Rama and Bhakta Hanuman and mata Sita are in out heart .... will an affidavit from ASI remove them from our heart?
RE:modi better than sonia
by Ram singh Dalit on Oct 15, 2007 09:08 PM Permalink
I am sure -by now everyone is aware what Soniaji and her core group involving Margret Alva,Oscar F. and Ahmed Patel are upto.
Thus the question is ,in the elections,why to support them and not Modi who atleast could speak for the majority?
RE:modi better than sonia
by victor p on Oct 15, 2007 09:09 PM Permalink
How scientific and logical is the masaccre of thousands of innocent non muslims by jehadis???
RE:modi better than sonia
by Hari Puttar on Oct 15, 2007 09:17 PM Permalink
How naive can people get? How can one equate calculate, planned genocide of a community by the GOVT in POWER, State sponsored genocide(Gujarat), with sporadic if multitudinous killing of Pundits by MOBS in Kashmir? Isn't there a difference. Don't we have brains? Can't we think? Anybody who thinks impartially and who has a conscience will know what I am talking about.
