Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Dis allow post election alliances
by siva kumar on Oct 06, 2007 07:20 PM   Permalink

In the name of alliance so many unconstitutional things are going on in our country.

As this suits every party at sometime or other nobody is really interested to stop this.



BJP was voted by the people and emerged as the single largest party, But by the oppurtunistic alliance of JD(S) and Cong it was not allowed to come to power. Then they called BJP as a communal party,,,, but BJP is a party recognised by the election commission and the constitution to exist and contest elections. Not only that, it is a democratic set up and the very people of Karnataka have voted for BJP to be the single largest party. But BJP was not allowed to form a Govt and two parties with less number of MLAs than BJP formed the Govt and made the single largest party to sit outside as opposition. Is it not unconstitutional and illogical?

Is it not fooling the voters and against democratic principles?

There is no proof for any party to be truely secular. Because all of them have aligned with BJP when it suited them and called it a communal party when not required.For this there in enogh proof. Even VP Singh, Mulayam , Mayavati or Karunanidhi, all had an alliance whenever they required BJP.Now it is Deve Gowda and his son.

Now the question is kumarasamy has enjoyed chief ministership with the support BJP by giving some promise and casting aspersions on BJP now is immoral, against human qualities.

So why to allow these people to divert the voters'verdict.So dont allow More post election alliance!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Karnataka: BJP wants President's rule