Che Guevara was born in a wealthy family. In order to discard his bourgeoisie background he had to identify more with the proletarians milling around. He was a mass murderer, a savage saddist, he died while pleading for his life, he clutched the legs of the CIA man who was to shoot him and begged him to spare his life. But then as good riddance he was shot and he died a gory death. And the civilized world felt relieved at the death of this deathly plague.
RE:CHE GUEVARA IS A SADIST MURDERER
by Lally Lally on Oct 06, 2007 03:37 PM Permalink
These people like Raju Aiyer write history by sitting on beds in their homes. He writes with the authority of Romila Thapar (LOL) .... Dear Raju, what do u profess dear? .... Join any profession, but not of a history teacher, thats my request.... Yes, Che was a murderer; but that evil and bad things have to be eliminated. Che did what China is doing today... China executes 5000 people annually. And that is imperative, as unwanted and undesirable elements need to be annihilated, along with positive strides made forward... Those killed on orders of Che were rapists, looters and cruel money lenders..... And Che stands justified in his act. Mr. Raju also writes, "while pleading for his life, he clutched the legs of the CIA man who was to shoot him and begged him to spare his life." .... Ufff! Log bhi kya kya kahaniyan bun lete hain .... Dear, why dont u join fiction writing bandwagon? .... For ur kind information, the last words of Che were addressed to his shooter only, in which he said, "Coward! Shoot .... You are only going to kill a man (not his philosophy)." ...... Thell words ooze bravely and strength, not timidness, as has been wrongly quoted by you. Please dont post anything on net, if u r not aware of the facts.
RE:CHE GUEVARA IS A SADIST MURDERER
by sanjeev dhiman on Oct 06, 2007 10:51 AM Permalink
your logic is the same one as propagated by the ghost of mccarthy and minoooo masani. the logic is as follows: if cia kills CHE it is okay, but if the bolsheviks kill the Tsar it is saadist. IF SOVIET UNION INTERVENES IN DR NAJIBULLAH RULED(COMMUNIST) AFGHANISTHAN THEN IT IS AGRESSION, BUT IF US-IMPERIALISM LED BUSH PLUNDERS AFGHNAISTHAN THEN IT IS A HUMINATARIAN ROLE.
