first he said that he does not believe in existence of ram. he is an atheist, so there is no god as per him. so that is ok. but then he goes on saying that ram was a drunkard. what a shameless act to get muslim votes! he just wanted to please the minorities by abusing hindu god. and unfortunately most of the muslims r communal and they vote as a block on communal basis. they do not have any other thing in mind while voting. whereas the majority hindus r divided and majority of them do not go to vote.
it is ridiculous that a ruling party has given call for a bandh. when sc decided against this (earlier sc had taken similar views on bandhs by shiv sena etc. shiv sena had once been fined also for calling bandh.), mk defied the ruling and ensured bandh. thus he is an anti social person.
it is surprising how any tamilian votes for him. he is also highly corrupt person. he removed one of his relatives from the central ministry just bcoz, he was brave enough to talk against his son stalin.
he also says that bjp is communal, but sides with bjp, when it suits him. earlier a central govt was distabilised by the congress party on the ground that dmk was part of it. now dmk is supporting the same congress at center, just to rule and make money.
such people r a blot on the country.
where is the pseudo secular intellectuals? had this act of defiance been done by modi or ba thakre, they would have all started shouting at the top of their voices.
RE:MK is an anti social person
by R A Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 01:14 PM Permalink
dear sowhat
in our country minorities r the most pampered lot. we have a sikh as the dummy pm, an christian lady as the super pm. till recently we also had a learned and highly popular scientist muslim as the president. nowhere else in the world this type of situation is possible. it is all bcoz the hindus r secular and do not bother about these matters.
but unfortunately most of the muslims of the world r communal. in india most of them vote as a block just keeping in mind 'islam'. they do not have anything else in mind while voting. bcoz of this the scrupulous politicians of the country fall over each other to appease muslims communally to get votes.
that is what mk is also doing. he is the biggest anti social and corrupt person in the country. earlier he replaced a central minister, just bcoz he dared to say something against the tv programme, which was owned by his son, stalin. this is just height of nepotism.
i am surprised how tamilians vote for such fellows.
RE:RE:MK is an anti social person
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 01:29 PM Permalink
Maran owns Sun Tv and no Mk's son stalin. get the facts right. But Karnanidhi is as corrupt as any other politician in India without doubt. if you wanna fight corruption, you need to fight every political leader rather than isolating Karunanidhi
RE:MK is an anti social person
by R A Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 01:38 PM Permalink
dear sowhat
i did not remember if it was stalin or maran's son. maran is also related to mk. this is also nepotism.
i am not isolating mk. as far as i remember he has done something so illegal, which no other politician has done before by going against the sc order. he is the biggest anti social politician in the country.
RE:RE:MK is an anti social person
by sowhat on Oct 03, 2007 05:04 AM Permalink
tell me one leader in whole India who is not corrupt? Why everyone corners MK?
RE:RE:MK is an anti social person
by Ram Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 04:25 PM Permalink
dear sowhat
what do u mean that if i fight against tn, i will fail. when did i fight with tn? why should i? i am against the selfish, anti social and corrupt mk fooling the minority for getting votes.
RE:RE:MK is an anti social person
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
Karnataka went against SC order every year. They never released water and Cauvery farmers died of hunger.
don't be partial. if you wanna fight for SC in every order, I am with u. but, if you just wanna fight against TN, u will fail
RE:RE:RE:MK is an anti social person
by sowhat on Oct 03, 2007 05:05 AM Permalink
All politicans are corrupt and have money. Why you worry only about MK?
RE:MK is an anti social person
by anan on Oct 02, 2007 09:43 PM Permalink
MK has also started a TV. Only God knows with the small money he is having, he was able to start a TV channel on his own.
RE:MK is an anti social person
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 01:26 PM Permalink
it's not the minority who create instability in India. it's the Ram movement
India when it got independence in 1947, it promised Staus-Quo of all minorities including Babri Masjid. But it got eventually destroyed.
What if we Buddist start destroying hindu Temples that were built on Buddist temples? Do you know most of the Tamils were Buddists and Jains before Hindus forcefully killed millions of them to convert them to Hindus. read history...
it's not majority rule in democratic system... it's common belief that rules in democratic system... get that first..
RE:RE:MK is an anti social person
by sowhat on Oct 03, 2007 05:03 AM Permalink
Tamilnadu was a Buddist/Jain state in 100 AD. What happend to all those Buddist and Jains?
RE:RE:MK is an anti social person
by R A Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
dear sowhat
i never said that minority created instability in the country. i am happy that u r a budhist. bcoz i like budha the most and would love to follow his ideals and i need not change my religion for that. but i don't know if u really follow what budha taught. bcoz japan and china r budhist countries. but the people there do not follow budhism. they r budhist in name only. i once asked a japanese friend that budha taught against killing of animals and how u people kill so many animals including whales (which was more than the quota). then he said that they started meat eating due to american influence. i did not talk more on the issue.
yes majority rules in a democracy and hindus r about 80%. still all powerful posts wer with minorities. can it happen in an muslim majority country or for that matter even in a christian majority country. no. bcoz hindus r the most secular in the world.
RE:RE:RE:MK is an anti social person
by Ram Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 04:23 PM Permalink
dear sowhat
u r making a mistake. democracy means the rule of the majority. it means whoever gets majority rules the country. it may b parliamentary like in our country or presidential as in usa etc.
the point i am making is that hindus r the most secular, hence it is not a problem in the country, if minorities hold all the top posts. it is not possible anywhere else in the world.
RE:MK is an anti social person
by sowhat on Oct 03, 2007 05:01 AM Permalink
No body has majority. the DPA government is not a majority government. it survive the help of regional parties.
DMK aliance won the whole Tamilnadu MP seats. so, they have majority in TN. as per your statement, the majority could do whatever they want. why you question them?
RE:MK is an anti social person
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 01:54 PM Permalink
We are not talking abt religion here. We are talking abt accepted political system in India.
When India got independence in India, it decided to secular. Meaning all minority religious places would be protected. But what happend? Babri Masjid was destroyed meaning minorty were not protected.
What did Supreme court do abt it?
Democracy is not majority rule... Democracy is equal rights for all including minority. Get the fact first.
