The dispute and conflict of judgement between Chennai High court and Delhi Supreme Court come openly to the public when Chennai high court dismissed the petition filed by AIADMK on Monday afternoon (Oct 1st) on Tamilnadu bundh issue. The Chennai High court said that if the case is handled by the Supreme Court than we have no business with it, you go to Supreme Court only. So they dismissed the AIADMK petition. Even Karunanidhi stated that he obeyed as per the direction of High court. Now the question is what is governor of the state role. Why opposition party go to Supreme Court when the sate governor is walking distance away. They know the Supreme Court can play the dance per their music on Sunday? Court is not a functionality office for the people. It is should act as a referee. This is like football referee is playing a game and putting a goal. This is a foul game supreme court. Now Karat shown a Red card to you! Go to bench now.
RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by R A Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 12:39 PM Permalink
dear kumar
u should not give any such comments against the sc judges. it is bcoz of these judges, that the politicians r slightly afraid of doing whatever comes to their mind. they r far better than the useless and corrupt politicians.
RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by kumar talk on Oct 02, 2007 01:05 PM Permalink
In that acse SUPREME COURT HAST START A POLITICAL PARTY AND CONTEST IN ELECTION IF THEY ARE SO HAPPY TO DO POLITICAL JOB! Ibet they loose theier deposit
RE:RE:RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 01:13 PM Permalink
They will get the Sivaji effect.
I am not MK supporter but he is the only one who could question these rediculous Ram movement in whole India. and he made enough fun of Ram. Now, when ready, MK would make fun of SC too.
supreme court just made themselves in a laughable position...
now, when they recruit judges to SC, they should call for 'Jokers Wanted'
RE:RE:RE:RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by R A Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 01:35 PM Permalink
dear sowhat
u r saying u r not mk supporter and u r supporting him fully even for his illegal action.
sc cannot b made laughable by such mean minded persons like mk.
it is really sad that there r people like u in the country, who do not have any respect for the judiciary and who have more love for such scrupulous politicians.
any atheist can make fun of any god. but that does not change the thinking of people. even after 80 years of communism, many people of earstwhile russia and yugoslavia fought against each other on religious basis. even now the muslims of chechenya in russia r fighting with the govt.
RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 01:41 PM Permalink
now, what SC did when TN farmer were dying without water? What SC did when Karnataka refused to release water on SC order? Now why they work on Sunday all of a sudden?
RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by R A Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 01:34 PM Permalink
dear kumar
getting elected in an election is not equivalent to honesty, specially in a country, where 50% of the people r illiterate. politicians adopt all type of corrupt practices in elections.
RE:RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 01:37 PM Permalink
Literate don't vote. it's illeterate who go to vote. Because illiterate have nothing when rich upper caste have everything
RE:RE:RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by sowhat on Oct 03, 2007 05:09 AM Permalink
that's all over India. No politician is honest. Why complain against karuna alone?
RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 12:49 PM Permalink
KARNATAKA made fun of SC judges when the SC judges asked them to release water to Tamilnadu to help Tamilnadu farmers.
SC judges could not do anything agains Karnataka government. But they work even on Sunday to work against Tamilnadu. what a joker these judges are? we know how to deal them... we have been dealing these jokers for 60 years and still prospering.
RE:RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by R A Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 01:23 PM Permalink
dear sowhat
u r wrong. sc did not work against tn. bandh means loss of work. earlier also the courts have fined shiv sena far calling bandh. do not blindly support mk, who is the biggest anti social and corrupt politician of the country.
our judiciary is much better of than the corrupt politicians. prosperity is there not bcoz of people like u. there r many good and knowledgeable persons all over the world, including tn. after liberalisation coastal areas all over the world r progressing better than other ares. it is true even in case of china.
stop talking in favour of such useless, anti social and corrupt politicians. if he was so good, why he was getting defeated continuously for about 15 years during mgr's (who was from kerala) time? since jailalitha is also arrogant, mk is unfortunately getting elected.
RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by sowhat on Oct 03, 2007 05:08 AM Permalink
RamSharma, it is not Tamils beat kannadiga. Kannidga displaced thousands of Tamil living in Bangalore. There were 15 Tamil deaths in riots.
RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by Ram Sharma on Oct 02, 2007 04:32 PM Permalink
dear sowhat
since aidmk from yr tn only approached sc. they felt that it is urgent, so they worked on sunday. it is for the sc to decide, what is more important. stopping all work in a state is never favoured by the sc. earlier shiv sena was also fined for a bandh. so there is nothing like sc going against tn. only tamilians had made the complaint. or u think that mk is tamilian and aidmk is not?
as regards river water problem i do not remember much, so i cannot comment. but i remember that once tamilians had beaten kannadigas living in tn on this issue, when jailalitha was cm. that was definitely wrong.
RE:Chennai High court Vs Supreme court
by sowhat on Oct 02, 2007 12:29 PM Permalink
Now, the whole India is against the oldest politician who is the only politician who could question the Ram movement that disintegrated India in the name of Ram. After him, there are no leaders (including the N-deal opposing communist) who could question the Ram movement. they just wanna get rid of him
