is PM interested in loosing all of his crdibility earned hardway !!! so far?Daily he is repeating the same tape but is not addressing the issue of INDIAN Non alinged POLICY,which is likely to affect Indai in future.Is he playing the same role played by some another in past 350 years ago when british came to India explaing the needs and requirements to then Rajas?Please for GOD sake do not play with future of India.
RE:poor pm
by satya pal on Nov 28, 2007 07:50 PM Permalink
l.k.advani as well as mr. man mohan singh are lying to the nation.credibility as a champion of small nations and leadership of non aligned nation is dead.india is militarily a very weak nation.no haste in signing the nuclear deal.a nation who can not produce a gun better than a.k 47 or a.k.56 can not dream of a big nation.india is first rate in developing country but third rate in production of engineering goods.money being spent on IIT is a simply waste of money.these graduates want to become i.a.s and i.p.s officers but does not want to become engineers.all trucks,cars,engines are made with foreign collabration.technically israel is superior than india. our govt. and media is misleading us.even light combat aircraft fighter is like a cycle before a bullet.look towards the cost of aircraft.bureacrats do not want engineers and doctors are paid more than them.high time go for privatisation,who can hire the best talent from the world.private sector is successful, because the hands of enginners are not tight.when ministers fall sick,then they rush to appolo hospital.wake up man mohan singh.you are digging the grave of india's foreign policy.america does not wants to give permanent seat in UNITED NATION.AMERICA WORKS INDEPENDENTLY.vietnam,iraq will prove america's wrong foreign policy.india must wait for another 10 years.work very very hard in development of engineering goods.do your own research work.follow the policy of brotherhood not like america.man mohan singh is intellige
RE:poor pm
by raja on Nov 28, 2007 09:02 PM Permalink
Hey buddy m nt a usual writer for such comments but ur point made me to write.Hey tell me one thin cn u plz define wat is Non alinged policy. Could u clear me no1 the countries who were non aligned were they really so, if so then I hav lots of eg which prove it to the contrary. No2 Did India really go to Non- aligned(I mean was it for the open international community only or there was some behind the door framework also. no3 tell wat was the credibility of such countries considering the fact that almost all of them were newly independent and were filed with instability of all kinds and even though had potential but still lived on with the help of other developed countries. Wat point I am making here does not suggest that I am writing in favour of other countries rather the point which I intend to make here is that though non alignment ws ok but was more of a publicity stunt. If u r not in favour of America its fine just no problem but then it also isnt fair to support some other polar country like Russi. Though Russia has been a trusted partner but still dont over look the fact that every country in the end works for his/her own benefit its just like survival, its jst that whoso ever survives the best our of his brains or resources is the fittest & hence the polarity. Wat India shud intend is smethin similar. As of S.Gandhi well its quite a thing 2 work 4some alien place considerin the fact tht she ws just a normal person. She hs done sme mistkes(to cont. later it depends)
RE:poor pm
by prachi on Nov 28, 2007 07:59 PM Permalink
non aligned movement ...please CHECK OUT ALL PROMINENT NON ALIGNED COUNTRIES NOW .... ( all poor countries/undeveloped countries cuba ..zambia...afghanistan.Indonesia...all these kinda )joke ..joke we need to get support of developed countries it can be US / Russia or any of them . what is imp is how it can help development of
