Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Indian Judiciary
by soma sekhar reddy on Nov 27, 2007 01:49 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

it's most unfortunte decision taken by the supreme court. if common man commited any such mistake he/she should deserve the punishment.
the supreme court accept the sanjay dutt bail is not unexpected everyone knows that sunjay will get a bail because of he is celebrity.. he may be the good actor . why indian judicial system will give more attention to such actor like Sanjay and Salman khan??? nobody is above law and order ..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Indian Judiciary
by Mohamadp on Nov 27, 2007 01:51 PM   Permalink
YOUR RIGHT

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Indian Judiciary
by b p on Nov 27, 2007 01:55 PM   Permalink
no, Sanjay is not a ordinary person, he is a son of a late MP of Congress. Congress is in obligation to do favours, so the drama goes on and on...
If a national party cannot protect his own party members and their family members, what sort of party is that?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Indian Judiciary
by Mohamadp on Nov 27, 2007 02:00 PM   Permalink
Natioanal parties should protect indians but not criminals

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Indian Judiciary
by emani rao on Nov 27, 2007 02:00 PM   Permalink
HELLO DEAR ! EVERYBODY IS EQUAL BEFORE LAW.
BUT SOMEPEOPLE LIKESANJAY DUTT ARE MORE EQUAL. THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE. WE R IN A SACRED COUNTRY CALLED INDIA. WE HAVE TO SEE MORE SUCH THINGS AND FACE TERRORISTS BULLETS NOW AND THEN.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Supreme Court grants bail to Sanjay Dutt