u.s.a. shall not twist the arm of india after signing the agreement.india should negotiate for the permanent seat in the united nations.india shall also find alternative sources of energy.like hudraulic energy thru' dam construction.water can be used for irrigation purposes.dual benefit from hydraulic energy.think deeply before signing the agreement.
RE:nuclear agreement
by Sunny Sunil on Nov 22, 2007 05:31 PM Permalink
In that case we have great problem of so called environmentalist who are always there to stop dam construction.
RE:nuclear agreement
by MOHAN PYARE on Nov 22, 2007 06:22 PM Permalink
For opposing nuclear plants, you say "build dams and make hydel power". When they go for building dams. you say "Do not build dams because it will submerge lot of land resulting in displacement of tribals". This happened in Gujarat when the government wanted to increase the height of Narmada dam. Again, plan of another dam on Narmada in Madhya pradesh had to be abandoned because of this problem. Yet another Hydel project on Koel-Karo was abandoned by NHPC in Jharkhand. Assamese are objecting to several prospective hydel projects in Assam. The list is endless.
RE:nuclear agreement
by Bhupendra Singh on Nov 25, 2007 10:43 PM Permalink
No Sir, we don't need dams nor the nuclear plants. WE NEED SOLAR AND WIND ENERGY. Yes, only that way, we will be able to save our planet. And we must thank Mr. Chetan Upadhyaya of Satya Foundation(his message is there at the beginning of this page only) for enlightening us. Bhupendra Singh
