It is written "The woman feels happy that she is able to give happiness to a lonely couple," she told this correspondent. Rubbish. How can a woman feel "happy" after letting out her own baby which she carried for 9 months. She should be feeling "guilty". and if she feels happy after giving (or selling) away her baby she is not worthy to be called a woman.
RE:happy???
by on Nov 02, 2007 04:40 PM Permalink
The woman is only carrying the baby in her womb. The sperm & egg are from the couple. so how could you say it is the womans baby. Shes gonna get paid for the job she is doing & she is doing it with her own will. so I dont see a problem with arguing if it is right or wrong.
RE:happy???
by on Nov 02, 2007 04:31 PM Permalink
guess its the ripple effect of too many soaps or "rajshri" films... for once please think like a human and not an indian!
RE:happy???
by ishwari ishwari on Nov 02, 2007 05:19 PM Permalink
Its not her baby.. its the couples baby.. she is just carrying it for 9 months..sometimes a womans uterus is not strong enough to carry a baby and so it gets aborted.. for such women surrogate moters is like a boon..
RE:happy???
by puneet on Nov 02, 2007 04:45 PM Permalink
i agree. There is a huge emotional cost involved. It must be really heart breaking to nurture an infant - feel it in your body and then letting it go, but it's like so many other heart-breakingthings in life. That's life.