Before partition Zinna stood for muslims and got them pakistan. What did congress stood for ? Nehur's PM chair ? This election also shows congress only stood for power, money and "Gandhi (questionable)" family.
But luckily Indian voter has become way smart now !!
Poor Rahul must be thinking what a waste of time, should rather be having fun in Italian beaches :-)
RE:What does congress stand for ?
by Sadasiva Prasad on May 12, 2007 05:40 AM Permalink
If Manmohan SIngh, Pranab Mukherjee, Shivraj Patil remain the highlights of the Congress, what else can you expect to happen to that party ? Very soon it will be wiped out of the Indian political scene. Probably this is how they manage politics in Italy !!
DID YOU KNOW, THAN IN 1946 ELECTION, CONGRESS DID NOT WIN A SINGLE SEAT ENMARKED FOR MUSLIMS IN PRESENT DAY GEOGRAHIC INDIA? ALL WERE OWN BY JINNA'S MUSLIM LEAGUE.
BUT CONGRESS CLAIMS THAT MUSLIMS WERE IT DURING FREEDOM STRUGGLE.
RE:What does congress stand for ?
by prakash kumar on May 12, 2007 03:08 AM Permalink
I feel for hindus. For muslims there was Zinna before partition. But who was for hindus ? If you talk to non hindus they like the fact that hindus are dividied in so many castes and rather fight among themselves.
RE:What does congress stand for ?
by KAUSTABH GHOSH on May 12, 2007 03:55 AM Permalink
Bhaskar Dada I feel really sorry for u. It is a pity that a learned person like you are after some particular religion.If you behave like this then what will others do. All your message is simple stupid stuff and proves your ignorance.We have lot many things to discuss rather than what you are doing after BJP loosing.If BJP won or as Mayavati has won nothing will change in your life.A more matured bahaviour is expected from you...
GHOSH-BHAI: HAHA..UNLESS U FACE FACTS, NOTHING IS GOING TO COME OUT. IT HAS TO BE RECONCILED.
AND STOP SHRINKING THE MOMENT 'MUSLIM' IS UTTERED.
THIS KNEE-JERK REACTION HAS DONE GREAT DAMAGE TO THAT COMMUNITY, AND NOW REST OF US ARE BEING AFFECTED.
WHY YOU WANT TO HIDE JINNAH'S HATEFILLED POLITICS WHICH GOT SUPPORT FROM BOTH ALIGARH AS WELL AS MULLAHS?
WHY YOU WANT TO HIDE (SAY) MEDIEVAL DEATH-DESTRUCTION, WHILE FACT REMAINS THOSE WERE DONE BY INVADERS, BUT MOST INDIAN MUSLIMS (EVEN 75% PER JINNAH OR 90% PER NEHRU) ARE INDIGENEOUS?
FACE FACTS BRAVELY, THEN ONLY SOMETHING MAY COME OUT.
BY SWEEPING STUFF UNDER CARPET ACTUALLY DO MORE DAMAGE.
RE:What does congress stand for ?
by Anil Tandale on May 12, 2007 05:12 AM Permalink
Even without Jinnah, the outlook of Muslims are identical as in 1946, and the Congress is ever ready to concede unborn demands through the dubious Sachar Commission. The UP electorate gave fitting reply to the party whose minister announced ransom reward to kill the Danish journo whose cartoon no body has seen. The Stalinist Communists of 2-Karat purity like Yechury, D. Raja and Javed, Mira Nair, who shamelessly come in support of poster painter MF Hussain, did not choose to bark about freedom of art or civil liberty of cartoonist. Excess of Muslim pampering by Mulayam from killing of Hindus in 1990 at Ayodhya onwards, has been his undoing. The Communists should wind up their parties, because dalits are truly represented by their caste-mate Mayavati, and not Brahmin born bourgeoise leaderships marinated from JNU.
RE:RE:What does congress stand for ?
by Sadasiva Prasad on May 12, 2007 05:45 AM Permalink
In the name of freedom of art, if tomorrow Hussain paints Sonia Gandhi, Ambika Soni, Shiela Dikshit in the nude, will Congress still support the idea of freedom of art ?
