Quodoes to Javed and Shabana for taking the case of fake encounters of innocents by Narendra Modi government.Javed should bring in light all the cases of encounters intead of sameer only he should also take the case of one lady of Mumbai killed in encounter. Gujrat which used to be most peace loving and money making state has bring shame for the people of country under the regime of modern day Nero and Hitler Narendra Modi,infact now Modi should resign and face trial agianst him
RE:Fake Encounters
by praveen on May 29, 2007 06:39 AM Permalink
This is called "DogalaPan" zaheen usmani. Whenever( once in a moon) Shabana Azmi and Javed Akhtar people raise voice against the fundamentalist Muslims, they are asked to shut their mouths.They can voice against Modi only.
Whether it was a fake encounter or real one, the matter of the fact is that Gujarat is now in peace and is progressing by leaps and bounds.
RE:Fake Encounters
by AmarAkbarAnthony on May 29, 2007 07:17 AM Permalink
If you know the meaning of FAKE or Staged, you will understand. It may not be difficult for police to make fake FIRs against anyone.
RE:Fake Encounters
by zaheen usmani on May 29, 2007 07:24 AM Permalink
Dear mr. Upadhya bringing RDX killing innoncents are crime either done by terrorist or policeman.It responsiblity of government to check and controll but an elected goverment can not kill innocents the govermnet responsiblity is to prevail harmony in the society despite the Bajpai suggestion of Raj Dhram Modi was engage in doing partiality in the name of caste and religion. As far as Hindutva is concern I like Hindutva and like ram rajya and want its establishment but I never like Modi style Hindutva and there is no rise of modi hindutva in the country except in gujrat, up is an example.
Hindutva is for peace and equlity and justice Lord Rama never prevailed partiality.
RE:Fake Encounters
by sm on May 29, 2007 08:14 AM Permalink
Zaheen, Lord Rama didn't have Islamic fundamentalism to worry about. He did have mighty problems wiping out Ravana and his demon army; but ultimately he truimphed.
Then as well; if the pseudo-secular media were available, they would've shouted only for Ravana's rights forgetting those of Goddess Sita, Lakshmana and the vanaras.
In short; the Indian Media can be PARTIAL/ Indian Judiciary can be BIASED or CBI can be BIASED , but Ramrajya should be impartial rule!!
Don't teach us Hinduism; we know it's pro-s and con-s.
It's the Islamic concept of KUFFAR that needs to change; or am i being blasphemous?? So what's your business suggesting ideas about 'Hindu' Ramrajya???
RE:Fake Encounters
by Sam on May 29, 2007 06:59 AM Permalink
zaheen: Terrorists hve given muslims a bad reputation, not only in India by all over the world. Try travelling in plane and see how a person, if a muslim, is checked 10 times.
By upporting jihadis, you may get a cheap thrill, but you are making matters worse for yourself and your bretheren in the long run. Same applies to Javed and Shabana.
FYI the person may be killed in a 'fake encounter', but he was a proven terrorists with liks to Jaesh-e-muhamad.