If a doctor commits mistake and somebody suffer, law punishes him.
If any other service provider cheats the consumer, - consumer has the right for compensation.
if an individual misguides court, he risks trial.
Same should apply to police. They are paid for this.
police brings case to court without properly investigating, and criminal become aquitted- Blame falls on court. They say 'LAW is Blind. nay.. Law is not Blind... Police is LAME and Headless.!!
Why police pretends to be taken by surprise if a criminal is freed by court, Court acts on the same constitutional system which police is supposed to be aware of. It is police's fault if they fail to understand the nature of their duty, and the likely outcome of the proofs presented by them, NOT fault of COURT.
There is an ugent need to take following steps:
If police detains somebody, it must be able to give convincing proof of his/her involvement in the court. a failure in this should amount negligence and failure to discharge its duty. Some type of punitive measure should exist to deter such negligence.
Arresting alive should mean SUCCESS . Encounter means half success.
Encounter does not mean the chapter is over.. Now police MUST prove that the person killed was a criminal of a level whose death can be tolerated.
Encounter should not be considered for merit/ promotion. as it blocks any chance of exposing the sponsor of the crime, leading to speculation and rumor rather than concrete evi
