Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
  RE:Destroying Ram Sethu will Hurt UPA Government
by Amit Phatak on May 24, 2007 08:09 AM   Permalink
Please give relevant information to the article you are commenting on. Although you have given nice info, it is no way related to Pranab Mukherjee's interview.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Destroying Ram Sethu will Hurt UPA Government
by Utkal Mohanty on May 24, 2007 11:10 AM   Permalink
And NASA has clearly said that it is not a man made structure. The desperate BJP idealogues always try to misinform. Their unscintific , backward outlook is the main reason why young, inteligent, tech-savvy voters prefer the Congress, or CPM, or DMK/ AiDMK/ TDP..all of whom are more scientific, more progressive in their outlook.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Destroying Ram Sethu will Hurt UPA Government
by Utkal Mohanty on May 24, 2007 12:17 PM   Permalink
Read this report in Wikipedia and please don't spread any more disinformation.
However, NASA has distanced itself from the claims related to the epic Ramayana: "The images [...] may be ours, but their interpretation is certainly not ours. [...] Remote sensing images or photographs from orbit cannot provide direct information about the origin or age of a chain of islands, and certainly cannot determine whether humans were involved in producing any of the patterns seen." They state there is no evidence of the "bridge" being anything but a natural series of sandbanks, and noted there is no evidence of human presence in the Indian subcontinent more than 350,000 years ago.[5]


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Destroying Ram Sethu will Hurt UPA Government
by Marshal Tito on May 24, 2007 04:07 PM   Permalink
Mohanty: Are you a naxal?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://specials.rediff.com/news/2007/may/23sd1.htm