Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Cool Atheist on May 15, 2007 11:51 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

by Cool Atheist on May 15, 2007 11:35 PM
(1)who gave USA junkies the rights for doing all this?
NONE,WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND OUR DEMOCRACY,CAPITALISM AND OF OUR FRIENDS(ISRAEL,UK...).WE CAN'T AFFORD PEACE BUS SERVICE OR TRAIN SERVICE AFTER 9/11 LIKE YOU GUYS DO TO APPEASE TERRORISTS.IF THEY WANT WAR WE WILL GIVE THEM A WAR.

(2)And if you have more Oil then do dig there?
THATS WHAT WE ARE GONE DO NOW,BUT DEFINEATLY WE DID NOT INVADE A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY LIKE IRAQ FOR OIL.WE DID IT,BECAUSE IT BETTER TO FIGHT THERE THAN IN OUR HOME.IT IS LIKE SAYING FOR INDIA TO FIGHT TERRORISM IN PAKISTAN THEN IN KASHMIR,DELHI,BANGALORE.......

(3)Great Great Lier. US eyeing Venezuela for Oil, Iran for Oil, Iraq for Oil?
NO US DOES NOT EYING OIL IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY.IT IS LIKE SAYING "INFOSYS" DOES BUSINESS IN USA,THAT MEANS INDIA IS EYING COMPUTERS IN USA.SAME WAY "EXXON-MOBILE" ARE FREE TO FIND OIL ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.IT IS CALLED FREE MARKET CAPITALISM.THEY DO BUSINESS IN LOT PLACES AND THEY DON'T NEED OUR PERMISSION TO DO.

(4)THIS IS THE JOKE U PEOPLE ARE LISTENING AND TELLING DAY IN AND DAY OUT.

more omen in baghdad were wearing mini skirts before being 'liberated' by US. ???????

YOU GOT IT WRONG,THE TRUTH IS "MORE WOMEN ARE GOING TO SCHOOL IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ"
AND IF THEY WANT TO WEAR SHORT SKIRTS IT IS LEFT
THEM AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT.WE ALWAYS SUPPORT THE IDEA OF MEN AND WOMEN ARE EQUAL AND WE STICK BY IT.IF IT IS DIFFICULT FOR YOU SWALLOW,IT IS NOT OUR PROBLEM.

(5)WE ARE RACIST???
NO DEFINITELY NOT,
WE CONTRIBUTED CLOSE TO 25 BILLION DOLLARS TO AFRICA ALONE PROVES THAT.ASK YOUR FAVORITE,SAUDI ARABIA TO DO THAT.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by vivekanand on May 16, 2007 12:36 AM   Permalink

SO... THIS IS ATHEIST TELLING US THAT DEMOCRACY IS SO WEAK THAT IT NEEDS TO BE DEFENDED BY BOMBIBNG OTHER SOVERIEGN NATIONS.

DONT QUESTION THAT US COULD NOT PROVE THAT LADEN DID 9/11 THING. REITERATING SOMETHING ENDLESSLY DOES NOT MAKE IT PROOF. AND WHERE ARE THOSE WMDs??

REPEATING LIES TO MAKE IT TRUTH IS SOMETHING U LEARNT FROM UR TORMENTOR GOEBELEZ.

'GIVE THEM WAR' but DONT CALL IT RELIGION.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Cool Atheist on May 16, 2007 01:03 AM   Permalink
(1)DEMOCRACY IS IN NOT WEAK,IT IS STRONG AND IT'S GIVES EQUALITY TO EVERYONE,WHETHER IT IS HE,SHE,ATHEIST,HINDU,MUSLIM,STRAIGHT,GAY,STRONG,OR HANDICAPPED PERSON.AND I THINK THATS NEEDS TO BE DEFENDED AT ANY COST.

BIN LADEN CREATES FRANCHISES OF TERRORISM.IT IS DIFFICULT TO PROVE DIRECT INVOLVEMENT NOT ONLY IN 9/11 BUT ALSO IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING.
CHECHNYA(RUSSIA)
KASHMIR(INDIA)
PHILIPPINES
KENYA
NAIROBI
SAUDI ARABIA
IRAQ
LONDON
SPAIN........

WHERE ARE THOSE WMDs??
HE USED AGAINST HIS OWN PEOPLE,HE USED IT AGAINST IRAN,HE HAD A NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.COMBINING ALL THESE THREE WE CONCLUDED THAT HE HAD STOCKPILE OF WMD.IF WE DID IT WRONG IT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO BRING STABILITY TO THAT REGION,EVEN THOUGH WE LOST 3000 SOLDIERS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THIS WAR.WE TRYING OUR BEST TO BRING STABILITY TO IRAQ.

GIVE THEM WAR' but DONT CALL IT RELIGION.
USA NEVER DID TRY TO CONVERT ANYONE INTO CHRISTIANITY.THE MORE HINDUS,MUSLIMS,BUDHIST,JEWS....ENJOY THERE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN USA THAN IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY.

UR TORMENTOR GOEBELEZ
WHO IS THIS?????????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on May 16, 2007 12:41 AM   Permalink

@vivekanad: Please read "Milestones" by Said Kutb to understand what the world is facing today.

These people DONOT accept anything- democracy, secularism, any .......ism. Except rule of Allah.

No man made law, ism is allowed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by vivekanand on May 16, 2007 01:05 AM   Permalink
Ok..
but why west behaving like terrorist?

they waged similar propaganda againt USSR. but being Indian we know it very well that Soviets were not that bad.

Now they are hiding all their misdeed under the cloud of propaganda against muslim.

who is kutb n whats his impact? nil. who are neocon? evident worldwide.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on May 16, 2007 01:20 AM   Permalink

@swamiji: u don;t know Kutb? he is the guru of Bin Laden and all assorted islamists, errorists you see today.

he was founder of islamic brotherhood in Egypt.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by vivekanand on May 16, 2007 01:40 AM   Permalink
it seems that majority muslims have rejected this kutb. quite sensible act by them.

compare this to subscibers of neocon.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Anurag Shrivastava on May 16, 2007 01:08 AM   Permalink
looks like your brother did not have his head blown off in the bombay train bombing ....don't talk like kid.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Anurag Shrivastava on May 16, 2007 12:45 AM   Permalink
Swamiji - please stop using CAPS. It makes you seem like an idiot. And yes - democracy has to be protected with weapons - India has more than 1000 insurgencies and our brave jawans fight them and kill them every minute. When there was coup in Maldives - we flew our troops to rescue democracy there. Unfortunately - India is not a very prosperous or technologically advanced country that it can project its power beyond 1000 miles of our borders. US needs to do it and it will be looked upon to intervene whenever evil rises anywhere in the world. Whether you like it or not. If someone attacks us - we have every right to go to his house and destroy it. If they bomb a building , we bomb a city . They attack our city , we destroy their country. The war against Islamic terror will brutal , cruel and disproportionate. No quarter will be given. No quarter will be expected. Any doubts ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on May 16, 2007 12:22 AM   Permalink

i don't agree to all what you wrote. neither i agree USA is 100% perfect.

But they are google times better than Islamists, islamic terrorists now breeding in large parts of the world, including india.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by vivekanand on May 16, 2007 01:33 AM   Permalink
Atheist,

all ur blabbering can be summerized in 3 words- 'MIGHT IS RIGHT'

Affirm this and nobody will argue u.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Cool Atheist on May 16, 2007 03:38 AM   Permalink
Mr.Vivekanada
All your blabbering can be summarized into two words "DYING COMMUNIST"

Since you say "being Indian we know it very well that Soviets were not that bad."

YEAH 100 MILLION OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE ARE DEAD IN COMMUNIST REGIMES,WHICH IS NOT THAT BAD FOR A GUY LIKE YOU.ANYWAY I KNOW NOW WHAT YOUR ARE.THERE NO POINT IN ARGUING WITH GUY WHO ENJOYS DEMOCRATIC FREEDOM OF INDIA AND PRAISES
EX-USSR.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:SETBACK FOR NEO-TALIBAN
by Anurag Shrivastava on May 15, 2007 11:57 PM   Permalink
Buddy - why do you waste your time countering these rabidly anti-american nuts who have only one grouse that US does not allow them to get inside easily ! And yes - on Iraq - admit it was a stupid mistake and move on . Some idiot made a typo so Iran got replaced by Iraq.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
A setback for the Neo Taliban