Let us draw the attention of our Shiv Shankar Menon internally. Take the case of Gujarat. So called "Super Secularists" "NGOs" funded by the Arab World, "English News Channel" backed by their American principle come together and bang Mr. Modi for the ills that happened during the Godhra carnage. Nobody would like to listen as to who was prime culprit or the prime motivator(s) of the conflict. Then, you would loose the section of the voters or you would harm their identity. Ok,Modi did play King Nero type of remaining mum. Then election took place and he won hands down spraying charcoal powders on these people mentioned above. Then comes the Vanzara case. All of a sudden he becomes a villian and Sohrabuddin becomes a bechara victim. Despite all these allegations or truth there has been significant growth in Gujarat. Despite being a uneasy calm as claimed by super secular english or hindi media channels or newspaper walas, politicians, ngo's how is it that there has been an economic growth in the state. For that you cant expect kudos from these people to Modi but when there has been a fake encounter on a secular mafia there is a hue and cry.
RE:Peace for good economics
by dpk on May 06, 2007 02:34 PM Permalink
1) The people killed in Godhra were Indians. The people killed after that were Indians as well. So as a chief minister of an Indian state Modi owes responsibility of both.
2) Lalu Yadav is seen as the prime reason for Indian railways success. Does it mean that he is now free of all Scams ? A lot of criminals get elected everywhere in the country does that mean that they are clean ?
3) Sohabuddin was a known criminal with 56 cases against him. These 56 cases were not registered in a day but over a long period. So it is a fact that he was operating from BJP ruled state for so long, so there is no need to say who was supporting him. When the BJP found that he has become a headache they used the supari killer police to kill him. Now this is just a matter of criminalization of the whole political system.
RE:Peace for good economics
by aim on May 06, 2007 08:17 PM Permalink
1) People killed in Godhra(Hindus) are lesser an Indian than people killed afterwards. Because there no comment about Kashmir and the genocide aganist Pandits conducted by moslems of kashmir. Over ten times the people have been killed in Kashmir than in Godhra. As usual, moslem residents are the sole reason for intigating violence and the resulting meyham. But moslem commentators as usual ignore those inconvenient facts and post only Gujarat.
(2) lalu Yadav is only reaping all the good work done by a few bureaucrats. Being the right man at the right place and that too at the right time, circumstances were kind to him. Kinda like Sonia Gandhi. PV Narasimha Rao and Vajpayee do the good work, she reaps the benefits. As usual, Hindus work hard and create all the wealth and moslems get first clim on resources.
(3) New details are emerging. Sohabbuddin was the guy behing the fake sex-cd case against a BJP leader. Possibly, his murdered wife the participant in the blackmail racket.
RE:Peace for good economics
by biz Narayan on May 06, 2007 02:49 PM Permalink
You can't have a group of people claiming to be torch bearers, and being paid by marxist mafia, as well as mafia supported with vested intrests.
Those who ignore this aspect of international funding, are ignorants, and more often benificiaries in a power structure.
The problem with argument#1 is that, suppose you fix responsibility, they you are forced to show him some respect for his office. Instead, you have columnists who would throw mud and disrty stuff at anybody who can listen to Modi. Instead these people would listen to propaganda of anti-national, vested intrests and sociologists.
It is scary when Budhadev says he will send police to Nandigram, why all these NGOs are missing, where their vocabulary gone ? Tasleema gets harassed even though she is part of the authors lobby.
The agents of antalatic have an issue with India, they want change to some dirty ideologies, including obnoxious marxism.
