Q: Why did MK not call a bandh over Cauvery issue? A: Udaya TV revenues in Karnataka Q: Why did MK not call a bandh over Mullaperiyar? A: Soorya TV revenues in Kerala Q: Why did MK not call a bandh over damming of Palar by AP? A: Gemini TV revenues in AP Q: Why did MK call for bandh over 27% OBC quota? A: The family hasn't yet started a TV channel targetted exclusively at forward castes
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by INA on Mar 30, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
I feel pitty for your comments.... Following are the real answers for that.
Why did MK not call a bandh over Cauvery issue? A: Cauvery TN got a fair deal, so need for bandh. Q: Why did MK not call a bandh over Mullaperiyar? A: SC gave verdict in favour of TN, so why should we call for bandh. Q: Why did MK not call a bandh over damming of Palar by AP? A: AP govt accepted that we will not do anything without consulting TN govt. Then whts the need of Bandh. Q: Why did MK call for bandh over 27% OBC quota? A: Because its the cunning and selfish brahmins suppressed all the innocen people for around 2000 years, he is like a saviour who called for bandh to protect them and bring back thier basic human rights.
RE:RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by Stephen Nadar on Mar 30, 2007 05:06 PM Permalink
but tamilnadu already has the highest caste based quota. Why you want more.. Dont u have self respect and self confidence that u can on ur own can come up in life
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by INA on Mar 30, 2007 05:12 PM Permalink
Ha ha ha speaking about self respect.
For morethan 2000 years, you never allowed anybody to get even primary education. And you enjoyed 100% reservation for morethan 2000 years, but these people asking for 68% reservation that too they are enjoying it for only around 30 years.
The community who enjoyed 100% reservation for 2000 years has no rights to talk about self-confidence and self-respects, because they are all like WOLFS.....
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by Stephen Nadar on Mar 30, 2007 05:16 PM Permalink
INA u dont know anythg abt Tamilnadu caste system... FYI nadar comes under OBC.. and never in my life i have take quota in anything..
68% reservation... better do one thing give 32% reservation to the other side..what do u say
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by INA on Mar 30, 2007 05:19 PM Permalink
If you are not taking quota thats up to you, But most of my friends from Nadar community are still using it and they are in very good position now, If the 69% reservation is not there then they might be doing some village cooli work right now in TN, thats the power of resevation....
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by Jurist Jurist on Mar 30, 2007 05:31 PM Permalink
Hai INA, What nonsense you are talking. You on your own admit that some of your friends are in very good position by availing the reservation. That is the truth and That is what SC also held while staying the Act. The 1931 data furnished before the SC never speaks the true story. Now all sections of the society gained advancement and it is the right time to put an end to reservation.
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by Stephen Nadar on Mar 30, 2007 05:31 PM Permalink
There is this minister called Chagal Bhujwal in Maharashtra. He owes Medical college, sugar mills etc and one of the richest in India. He is an OBC. Do you feel he or his family member should be given quote benefit.
Or do you feel that he was ever supressed in his life. if he had been than he would have been a coliee in some village of maha.
You want to beg you beg. I believed in my talent and i can proudly say that i come up with any bolw in my hand. If you agree that ur r a begger than no issue, i full fill that u shud be given a quota
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by Jurist Jurist on Mar 30, 2007 05:19 PM Permalink
I am against the present form of reservation followed in INDIA, because
Where the daughter of an IFS officer turned President of India still claim her self as a member of weaker section and join IFS under quota and still call herself as member of weaker section and can push through her children under reservation,
Where all the central and state ministers who are crorepathi, still call them selves as weaker section and claim all the benefits to their children under reservation,
Where all the MPs and MLAs who are richest among the rich still call them selves as weaker section and can push through their children under reservation,
Where public and private sector employees drawing laks of rupees as salary and who are also IT assesses, still call them selves as weaker section and claim all the benefits to their children under reservation,
Where all businessmen possessing assets worth for crores and crores of money still call them selves as weaker section and can push through their children under reservation.
But on the contrary some sections of the society in the name of CASTE, will be denied of any such benefits in spite of the fact that still most of them are poorer than the members of the so called downtrodden community.
Where a small group of persons in the so called downtrodden community still call them selves as weaker section and can push through their children under reservation again and again and corners the benefit of reservation for generations together and denying the same to the members of their own community who actually deserves for the same.
INDIAN style of reservation is nothing but a State sponsored fraud on its subjects.
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by Balaji Mathaiyan on Mar 30, 2007 05:44 PM Permalink
Even though these Quotas are given there is no poor one going to utilise. Instead of that Rich OBC peoples only get seats.
Here these guys are not able to fund for Govt Engg Colleges like Bargur Engg College.
Thay have no intensions to improve the stats of Govt Eng Colleges. But doing political dramas!!!
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by rajagopalan nadimuthu on Mar 31, 2007 07:15 PM Permalink
When all institutions are closed including petty shop keepers under force ,why sun TV alone should function.Is it logical or reasonable or justifiable ? Tell me sir. RAJ
RE:Why no bandh for other issues?
by Nandakumar M on Mar 30, 2007 05:01 PM Permalink
Wrong. His family channels are already targetted at forward caste(aka brahmins), but in all negative sense.