though i have been totally against the ethics of Communists of our world yet i do not accept the view of ADvani.i am a RSS believer and hence a nation is first and then cry of human rights.see the behaviour of Nandigram people and the path they had chosen for 2 months. Budhdeb da gave sufficient time to people though it is against ethics of comrades and Nandigram people did not listen and instead opted for violence--a path usually followed by comrades.Mr Advani,Jalianwalanbagh was an assembly of people who wanted their Nation free from English and hence martyers were there to die for country.MR ADVANI--ANY PROBLEM WITH U WHILE COMPARING THIS EPISODE WITH JALIANWALAN BAGH.REG HUMANRIGHTISTS THEY MUST GO TO THEIR MOTHERS FIRST AND SEEK DEFINITION OF KILLING OF OUR JAWANS IN KASHMIR NAGALAND ASSAM MANIPUR TRIPURA AND THEN GET ARMY PEOPLE ARRESTED.FAKE ENCOUNTERS BY POLICE NOT ACCEPTABLE BUT U CANNOT TERM IT A FAKE AS AND WHEN ARMY TAKES AN ACTION--LALITKUMAR
RE:no i do not accept this version of human rights
by Tapas Konar on Mar 17, 2007 04:45 PM Permalink
I must agree that you have a good sense of humour !!You are not worried about the precious lives got bullet-riddled (most of them being children & women), hundreds of bodies covered by bloods were thrown in the river Haldi.I think being a woman how can you be such a heartless person that without uttering any words to show sympathy to the victims you have enough time to compare the incidents, whether this can be compared with Jalianwala Bagh, how funny !!Even we show sympathy to a deathsentenced person, but you have forgotten to show minimum courtsy even !!
RE:no i do not accept this version of human rights
by rajan goyal on Mar 17, 2007 05:56 PM Permalink
Mr.Lalit you can not be a RSS believer.what i believe is you donot understand the meaning of confiscation of the only source of income of farmers,you will understand only when someone give you two months time to vacate your home & force you to gaveup your only source of income. Will this not be injustice with you. Those people were not miscreants and can not named as mob. They were also not insurgents. We are living in a FREE & DEMOCRATIC country. Every one has right to speak against atrocities. If you can not make out what is JUSTICE or INJUSTICE, then you are not rational.
RE:no i do not accept this version of human rights
by Shubro Shankar on Mar 17, 2007 04:43 PM Permalink
Rachita, I agree with you. This massacre at Nandigram ought not to be compared with that at Jalianwala Bagh. But the agreement ends there.
Instead it should be called comparable to another heinous crime that communists committed in China in 1995 at the Tianamen square.
The commies, are theologically, are theocrats and autocrats. They invariably become tyrants. See, the Western people eulogise the speed at which development is taking place in China...
You know how? Four commie leaders will shut themselves up in a room and decide that a 16 lane road will be built, and the next day will come the bulldozers to raze everything. No protest would be tolerated. Or else, you will be called the enemy of the state.
The commies at WB are no different. They said it was India's fault when China attacked India. Such is their audacity. I guess they would be statisfied if Chinese millitray progresses as far as West Bengal.
RE:no i do not accept this version of human rights
by Anil Kumar on Mar 17, 2007 04:30 PM Permalink
I Believe you got it wrong, The villages we surrounded by CPM commerades and police and thay dont have any choice rather than face the bullets and that is the comparison.Not to offend you but Your languae clearly shows that you are a communist supporter :-)
RE:RE:no i do not accept this version of human rights
by BRIJ MIMANI on Mar 17, 2007 04:49 PM Permalink
It was a law and order problem (as per government version and it was right of the government to do the job. Fine. Dear Bholowalia, what was the CPM cadres with sticks etc was doing over there. Is there is any law passed by the assembly/parliament where police/RAF/army is allowed to take help of those who think that they are law onto themselves. The only thing if law is to be enforced it should be according to the law only and not on the whims of some people. Please try to see the fourth dimension of the situation before saying anything. You need some more soul searching not in your ac bed room/office but at the place called "NANDIGRAM"
