I don't know how Sunjay Dutt is considered less guilty than the other convicted? It is not a good precedent at all. Others feeling bias is a natural thing.
RE:Not a good precedent
by lovely purohit on Mar 10, 2007 02:16 PM Permalink
Sanjay dutt is a actor and he is able and do give back to society and he is currently not involved in those immature thing he used to do aka drugs and getting ak 47 for his own/family security. think abt it .. there is no reason for him 2 involve in terrorist activities. he was just immature and now it doesnt make sense to keep him in jail.
RE:RE:Not a good precedent
by Hindustani on Mar 10, 2007 02:26 PM Permalink
You are giving verdict or opinion? What do you think of those who were arrested on similar charges but are now convicted (by the HONEST police etc.). Don't have rational feelings. You must be aware of the recent Naxalite attacks. What is the follow-up of law in those cases? Do we have to expect any positive outcome?
RE:RE:RE:Not a good precedent
by lovely purohit on Mar 10, 2007 07:43 PM Permalink
Neither verdict(which I cant) nor opinion but thts exactly y he was acquitted for conspiracy. he still convicted for the arms act but they can also who are convicted for arms act appeal in the court for probation of good conduct. agreed he is rich and he'll try to save himself but by doing so he is not harmin neone n also he is providing gud entertainment 2 ppl. btw there is no link with naxlite attacks here.. Iam just talking abt sanjay dutt .
