Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
why no to kalam
by anil kumar sood on Jun 17, 2007 02:01 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

congress has left with no respect for merit , knowledge, and moral. see bjp, considered to be hindu party, feilding Kalam and ensuring its victory. friends it was true secularism practised,not preached like sonia's congress .Sonia's Congress is afraid of Kalam because he has guts to say "no" if Sonis again dared to thought of becoming PM

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:why no to kalam
by saurabh prasad on Jun 17, 2007 02:11 PM   Permalink
no to kalam because there has never been a two term president in india. thats why. not because of any other reason

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:why no to kalam
by subbu on Jun 17, 2007 02:23 PM   Permalink
Why should you follow that rule?When nehru was prime minister for several terms why not President?Does the constitution forbid that-not at all?The exclusion of kalam is because congress wants to keep its boot licker so that by chance congress comes once again sonia can become the PM without difficulty!So it is the crookedness of Antonia Maino which has resulted in this appointment!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'We're still a state of shock'