"The couple, with Ravi, Purushottaman and others in tow, then entered the temple to offer prayer; Mercy, a Christian by birth and belief, stayed outside; as a non-Hindu, she was not permitted entry into the temple premises.
An unknown devotee spotted a cross dangling on the gold chain Mercy had draped around her son's neck, and complained to one of the priests that a Christian had entered the temple."
Wonder why she hung a chain with a cross just as he was entering the temple?
Surely the minister's wife could afford other "secular" or even Hindu gold chains.
And now the same minster is using "caste" and "Brahmanical arrogance" for political mileage.
I guess he forgot about that "little" incident.
What shopuld be doen when this rvaikrishna entered the temple wearing a cross, if the rules are clear?
How cheap.
Probably good for beating up the Hindus. (here the leftist& congress are allies)
In contrast look and learn from this 93 year old person above
RE:NOw just a little background
by Tinda on Jun 13, 2007 01:01 AM Permalink
All this charade has been deliberetly done by this politician. And deliberately her wife ensured that the children were made to wear a chain carrying a cross so that others could see it and create a ruckus. The entire family is Christian and I will not be surprised if the church is involved in this. Many christians in the last year have been giving stories to the press about entering Hindu temples to create bad publicity for Hinduism. there is something fishy. Sounds like some bishops are orchestrating all this from behind the scenes.
