Why was the route of Metro passing 'close' Qutub Minar in New Delhi was abandoned and later reworked fearing prospective damages to this 815 years man made monument?
Why the project of Taj corridor (which would have made lot of dollars to our money minded govt) was put off after the hue and cry of environmentalists as the construction near Taj 'may' cause bad effect on this 359 years old man made monument. Please give attention here that these monuments were not going to be destroyed but were 'feared' to get damaged.
Will any government in China would destroy or even alter The great wall of China(2695 years old) for the sake of any amount of money?
Will any one allow pulling down 4507 years old Pyramids of Egypt in lieu of any uncountable amount of money?
If the answer is NO, then why this 17,25,000 years old man made monument is being destroyed for the sake of some
RE:ram setu
by blue wrox on Jun 11, 2007 07:06 PM Permalink
because all the rest is made by man.This is not.Its in our waters.Why dont you jump in and get evidence that its built by man?
RE:ram setu
by Elas Kumar on Jun 11, 2007 07:21 PM Permalink
Leave it whether it is man made or not.... Let speak that it is created naturally.... If you believe natural formation has some reasons then first explore the reason why should nature form these kind of sand patches... Tsunami effect were less on indian shore even because of these kind of sand patches formed in Bay of Bengal (I am not sticking only with Ram Sethu for Tsunami)....
Sure Sethu Project is going to be worthsome (Long term benefit) when water transport is going to increase because of import and export..
But give a serious thought on these sand fills out of box thinking question why nature has created why nature has created...
If scientifically proved it is man made then protect it as a old age monuement...
RE:ram setu
by guru on Jun 11, 2007 07:22 PM Permalink
From where do you bring the evidence for all historical facts. You need to belive and one should respect it.
